AJJCS
Products News Help
Client Sign In

CORRECTION - IRS Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Average Income Test

person A.J. Johnson today 11/02/2020

Thank God my clients read better than I type. One of my more astute readers noticed a pretty significant typo in the example in #1 below. I have corrected the error - I hope it did not create too much consternation among my careful readers.

On October 30, the IRS published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register. This Notice concerns the LIHTC Average Income Test and outlines the current intention of the IRS with regard to certain rules governing the Average Income (AI) test.

Written comments regarding the proposed rules must be received at the IRS no later than December 29, 2020.

Background

Section 42(g)(1)(C)(i) enunciates the requirement of the AI set-aside, stating that a project meets the minimum requirements of the average income test if 40 percent or more (25 percent in New York City) of the residential units in the project are both rent-restricted and occupied by tenants whose income does not exceed the imputed income limitation designated by the owner with respect to the respective unit. The owner must designate the imputed income limitation for each unit and the designated imputed income limitation of any unit must be 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, or 80 percent of AMGI. The Code provides that the average of the imputed income limitations designated by the taxpayer (i.e., owner) for each unit must not exceed 60 percent of AMGI.

Section 42(g)(2)(D)(iii) was added to the Code to provide a new next available unit (NAU) rule for situations in which the owner has elected the AI test. Under this new NAU rule, a unit ceases to be a low-income unit if two conditions are met: (1) the income of an occupant of a low-income unit increases above 140% of the greater of (i) 60% of AMGI, or (ii) the imputed income limitation designated by the owner with respect to the unit; and (2) any other residential rental unit in the building that is of a size comparable to, or smaller than, that unit is occupied by a new tenant whose income exceeds the applicable imputed income limitation. If the new tenant occupies a unit that was taken into account as a low-income unit prior to becoming vacant, the applicable imputed income limitation is the limitation designated with respect to the unit. If the new tenant occupies a market-rate unit, the applicable imputed income limitation is the limitation that would have to be designated with respect to the unit in order for the project to continue to maintain an average of the designations of 60% of AMGI or lower.

Under §42(g), once a taxpayer elects to use a particular set-aside test with respect to a low-income housing project, that election is irrevocable. Thus, if a taxpayer had previously elected to use the 20/50 or 40/60 test, the taxpayer may not subsequently elect to use the AI test.

Explanation of Provisions

  1. Proposed §1.42-15, Next Available Unit Rule for the Average Income Test
    1. The proposed regulations update the NAU provisions in §1.42.15. In situations where multiple units are over-income at the same time in an AI project that has a mix of low-income and market-rate units, these regulations provide that the owner need not comply with the NAU rule in a specific order. Renting any available comparable or smaller vacant unit to a qualified tenant maintains the status of all over-income units as low-income units until the next comparable or smaller unit becomes available. E.g., in a 20-unit building with nine low-income units (three units at 80% of AMGI, two units at 70% of AMGI, one unit at 40% of AMGI, and three units at 30% of AMGI), if there are two over-income units, one a 30% income three-bedroom unit and another a 70% two-bedroom unit, and the NAU is a vacant two-bedroom market-rate unit, renting the vacant two-bedroom unit to occupants at either the 30 or 70 percent income limitation would satisfy both the minimum set-aside of 40% and the average test of 60% or lower. This will be the case even if the 30% unit was the first unit to exceed the 140% income level.
  2. Proposed §1.42-19, Average Income Test
    1. Designation of Imputed Income Limitations: The proposed regulations provide that a taxpayer must designate the imputed income limitation of each unit taken into account under the AI test in accordance with (1) any procedures established by the IRS; and (2) any procedures established by the Agency that has jurisdiction over the LIHTC project that contains the units to be designated, to the extent that those Agency procedures are consistent with any IRS guidance and the proposed regulations. The IRS does agree that Agencies should generally be able to establish designation procedures that accommodate their needs. Agencies will be permitted to require income recertifications, set compliance testing periods, and adjust compliance monitoring fees to reflect the additional costs associated with monitoring the AI test.
  3. Method and Timing of Unit Designation
    1. Designation of the AI limitation with respect to a unit is, first, for Agencies to evaluate the proper mix of units in a project in making housing credit dollar amount allocations consistent with the state policies and procedures set forth in the QAP, and second, to carry out their compliance-monitoring responsibilities.
    2. The proposed regulation requires that taxpayers designate the units in accordance with the Agency procedures relating to such designations, provide that the Agency procedures are consistent with any requirements and procedures relating to the unit designation that the IRS may require.
    3. The proposed regulations provide that the taxpayer must complete the initial designation of all the units included in the AI test as of the close of the first taxable year of the credit period.
    4. The proposed regulations provide that no change to the designated income limitations may be made. Based on this, it does not appear that the "floating" of units would be permitted. This will be problematic from a project operational standpoint and should be objected to in comments submitted to the IRS.
  4. Requirement to Maintain 60 Percent AMGI Average Test and Opportunity to Take Mitigating Actions
    1. For a project electing the AI test, in addition to the project containing at least 40% low-income units, the designated imputed income limitations of the project must meet the requirement of an average test. That is, the average of the designated imputed income limitations of all low-income units (including units in excess of the minimum 40% set-aside) must be 60 percent of AMGI or lower. Residential units that are not included in the computation of the average (i.e., market units) do not count as low-income units. Accordingly, in each taxable year, the average of all the designations must be 60% of AMGI or lower.
    2. In some situations, the AI requirement may magnify the adverse consequences of a single unit’s failure to maintain its status as a low-income unit (this is a reference to the "cliff test" fear). Assume, for example, a 100% low-income project in which a single unit is taken out of service. Under the 20/50 or 40/60 set-asides, the project remains a qualified low-income housing project even though the reduction in qualified basis may trigger a corresponding amount of recapture. However, under the AI set-aside, if the failing unit has a designated imputed income limitation that is 60% or less of AMGI, the average of the limitations without that unit may now be more than 60%. In the absence of some relief provision under the AI test, the entire project would fail, and the taxpayer would experience a large recapture.
    3. Because there is no indication that Congress intended such a stark disparity between the AI set-aside and the existing 20/50 and 40/60 set-asides, the proposed regulations provide for certain mitigating actions. If the taxpayer takes a mitigating action within 60 days of the close of a year for which the AI test might be violated, to taxpayer avoids total disqualification of the project and significantly reduces the amount of recapture.
  5. Results Following an Opportunity to Take Mitigating Actions
    1. The proposed regulations provide that, after any mitigating actions, if, prior to the end of the 60th day following the year in which the project would otherwise fail the 60% test, the project satisfies all other requirements to be a qualified low-income housing project, then as a result of the mitigating action, the project is treated as having satisfied the 60% or lower average test at the close of the immediately preceding year. However, if no mitigating actions are taken, the project fails to be a qualified low-income housing project as of the close of the year in which the project fails the AI test.
  6. Descriptions of Mitigating Actions
    1. The proposed regulations provide for two possible mitigating actions: (1) the taxpayer may convert one or more market-rate units to low-income units. Immediately prior to becoming a low-income unit, that unit must be vacant or occupied by a tenant who qualifies for residence in a low-income unit (or units) and whose income is not greater than the new imputed income limitation of that unit (or units); or (2) the taxpayer may identify one or more low-income units as "removed" units. A unit may be a removed unit only if it complies with all the requirements of Section 42 to be a low-income unit. If the taxpayer elects to identify a low-income unit as a removed unit, the designated imputed income limitation of the unit is not changed.
  7. Tax Treatment of Removed Units
    1. A removed unit is not included in computing the average of the imputed income limitations of the low-income units under the 60% or lower AI test. If the absence of one or more removed units from the computation causes fewer than 40% (or 25% in New York City) of the residential units to be taken into account in computing the average, the project fails to be a qualified low-income housing project. I.e., the project fails the minimum set-aside test. Also, a removed unit is not treated as a low-income unit for purposes of credit calculation. However, a removed unit will not be subject to recapture (unless the removal of the unit results in a failure to meet the minimum set-aside).
  8. Request for Comments on an Alternative Mitigating Action Approach
    1. This is the one area of the proposed regulation for which the IRS is especially interested in receiving comments. The alternative being proposed by the IRS is that, in the event that the average test rises above 60% of AMGI as of the close of a taxable year, due to a low-income unit or units ceasing to be treated as a low-income unit or units, the owner may take the mitigating action of redesignating the imputed income limit of a low-income unit to return the average test to 60% of AMGI or lower. If under this approach, a redesignation causes a low-income unit to exceed 140% of the applicable income limit, the NAU would apply.

Proposed Applicability Date

The amendments to the NAU regulation (1.42-15) are proposed to apply to occupancy beginning 60 or more days after the date the regulations are published as final regulations. The AI test regulations (1.42-19) are proposed to apply to taxable years beginning after the date the regulations are published as final regulations. However, taxpayers may rely on these proposed regulations relating to the NAU rule for occupancy beginning after October 30, 2020, and on or before 60 days after the date, the regulations are published as a final regulation. Taxpayers may also rely on the AI test proposed regulations for taxable years beginning after October 30, 2020, and on or before the date those regulations are published as final regulations.

Summary

These proposed regulations do provide some clarity relating to the Available Unit Rule and assist in our understanding that the IRS does not believe a project should lose all credit due to the failure of one unit as a low-income unit (unless the minimum set-aside is not met). However, a significant problem with the proposed regulation is that designations, once set, cannot be changed. The industry will certainly be objecting to this provision during the 60-day comment period. There is one other area on which clarity should be sought. All the mitigation examples in the proposed regulation include a case where a unit is lost due to no longer being suitable for occupancy. Left unanswered is what happens if a low-income unit is occupied by an ineligible household. Does the fact that the owner designation for the unit still results in the 60% AI test being met keep the property in compliance with the 60% test result in the loss of only that one unit with no requirement for mitigation measures? Or, would this unit also no longer be considered a low-income unit for purposes of the 60% average? Also, what if the issue that would remove a unit from the low-income count occurs in one year, is not discovered by the owner, and is discovered by the State Agency during a review that occurs more than 60 days after the end of the tax year in which the event occurred? While this could not happen in the case of a habitability issue, it could certainly occur relative to resident eligibility.  Comments seeking clarity on the circumstances under which a unit may no longer be counted toward the 60% average are a certainty. Until this issue is clarified, the safest course of action for owners will be to follow the mitigation alternatives outlined in the proposed regulation in any case where a low-income unit is either not in service or rented to an ineligible household.

It is recommended that all LIHTC industry participants review the proposed regulations and make comments to the IRS by the deadline date of December 29, 2020.

Latest Articles

Navigating the HOME Final Rule- Key Updates on Property Standards and Inspections

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recently updated the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Final Rule, emphasizing enhanced property standards and inspection requirements for participating jurisdictions (PJs). These updates aim to improve safety, accessibility, energy efficiency, and disaster resilience across affordable housing projects. New Construction Projects For new construction projects under the HOME program, the following standards are essential: Accessibility Compliance: Projects must comply with the design and construction requirements of 24 CFR part 8, Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Fair Housing Act. Energy Efficiency: Compliance with energy standards such as ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 for high-rise multifamily buildings and the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code for single-family and low-rise multifamily buildings is mandatory. Disaster Mitigation: New constructions must incorporate features that mitigate future disaster risks in alignment with state and local codes. Detailed Documentation: Construction contracts and documents must be sufficiently detailed to facilitate inspections. Broadband Infrastructure: Broadband installation is required for projects with more than four rental units unless it poses significant financial or logistical challenges. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems must comply with HUD standards. Rehabilitation Projects Rehabilitation projects are subject to the following requirements: Code Compliance: All projects must meet applicable state and local codes or, in their absence, HUD s minimum property standards. Disaster Preparedness: Measures to mitigate future disaster impacts are mandatory. Inspection Documentation: As with new construction, detailed contracts and documents must support the inspection process. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems are required, with allowances for battery-powered smoke alarms in specific cases. Green Building Standards: If the project's cost exceeds the maximum per-unit subsidy limit, it must meet green building standards. Acquisition of Existing Housing For existing housing acquisitions, specific standards apply: Recent Construction or Rehabilitation: Properties built or rehabilitated within 12 months before commitment must meet the respective standards. Safe and Sanitary Conditions: Homes intended for homeownership must be decent, safe, and sanitary, with inspections conducted no earlier than 90 days before commitment. Timely Compliance: Properties must meet standards at purchase or within six months of acquisition, which can be extended to 12 months if necessary. Combination Projects Combination projects that include rehabilitation and new construction must apply the respective standards to each component. Ongoing Property Condition Standards and Inspections To maintain compliance throughout the affordability period, ongoing requirements include: Code Adherence: Properties must meet state and local codes and HUD standards. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems remain mandatory. Inspection Frequency:Initial and annual inspections for tenant-based rental assistance units.On-site inspections within 12 months of project completion and every three years thereafter. Increased inspection frequency for properties with health and safety deficiencies. Acceptance of Alternative Inspections: Inspections under other HUD programs or HUD-approved standards may be accepted. Inspection Procedures To ensure consistency and thoroughness, inspection procedures must include: Detailed Checklists: Inspection checklists and process descriptions. Training: Training and certification protocols for inspectors. Sampling Standards:At least four units must be inspected for projects with up to 20 HOME-assisted units.For projects with 21-130 units, 20% must be inspected. For larger projects, inspection sampling aligns with the NSPIRE methodology. Small-Scale Housing: Streamlined requirements for projects with 1-4 units to reduce administrative burdens. Conclusion The updated HOME Final Rule provides a robust framework to enhance the quality, safety, and sustainability of affordable housing projects. By adhering to these comprehensive standards and inspection protocols, participating jurisdictions can ensure that housing remains affordable, resilient, and livable for years to come.

Read full story

A. J. Johnson Partners with Mid-Atlantic AHMA for December Training on Affordable Housing - February 2025

In February 2025, A. J. Johnson will partner with the MidAtlantic Affordable Housing Management Association for four live webinar training sessions for real estate professionals, particularly those in the affordable multifamily housing field. The following sessions will be presented: February 11: Basic LIHTC Compliance - This training is designed primarily for site and investment asset managers responsible for site-related asset management. It is especially beneficial to those managers who are relatively inexperienced in the tax credit program. It covers all aspects of credit related to on-site management, including the applicant interview process, determining resident eligibility (income and student issues), handling recertification, setting rents - including a full review of utility allowance requirements - lease issues, and the importance of maintaining the property. The training includes problems and questions to ensure students fully comprehend the material. February 13: Dealing with Income and Assets in Affordable Multifamily Housing - Course Overview - This live webinar provides concentrated instruction on the required methodology for calculating and verifying income and determining the value of assets and income generated by those assets. The first section of the course involves a comprehensive discussion of employment income, military pay, pensions/social security, self-employment income, and child support. It concludes with workshop problems designed to test what the student has learned during the discussion phase of the training and serve to reinforce HUD-required techniques for determining income. The second component of the training focuses on a detailed discussion of requirements related to determining asset value and income. It applies to all federal housing programs, including the low-income housing tax credit, tax-exempt bonds, Section 8, Section 515, and HOME. Multiple types of assets are covered in terms of what constitutes an asset and how they must be verified. This section also concludes with problems designed to test the student s understanding of the basic requirements relative to assets. February 18: Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment & Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - Dealing with tenant-on-tenant harassment is an evolving area of fair housing law. Landlords are generally familiar with how their actions can be construed as discriminatory. But how should they react when one resident violates another's fair housing rights? Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sex in the workplace - including sexual harassment. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees. In addition to having a written sexual harassment policy, companies should also have an effective complaint procedure. Many businesses in the United States have no policies regarding sexual harassment, and such harassment occurs in the highest levels of corporate management. However, the risk of not having such a policy far outweighs the effort required to implement one. These risks are more significant now than ever before. Victims of sexual harassment may now recover damages (including punitive damages), and the Supreme Court has made it easier to prove injury. This two-hour training is designed to help property owners and managers understand the current legal state of these two issues and establish policies to limit potential liability. The session will include a discussion of the most relevant court cases relating to tenant-on-tenant harassment and cases that outline employer risk regarding harassment in the workplace. Participants will also be provided with recommended policies to limit potential liability. February 20: Virginia Landlord Tenant Act Issues for Multifamily Housing Managers Join us for an essential three-hour webinar that provides a comprehensive overview of the Virginia Residential Landlord Tenant Act (VRLTA), critical knowledge for every multifamily housing professional. This intensive training will equip property managers with the latest legal requirements and best practices for successful property operations in Virginia. Key topics include: Essential lease provisions and prohibited practices Security deposit requirements and handling Maintenance obligations and responsibilities Proper notice requirements and tenant communications Rights of entry and property access Handling lease violations and evictions Required disclosures and documentation Tenant rights and remedies Managing emergencies and property damage Recent updates to landlord-tenant law Led by A. J. Johnson, this webinar offers practical insights and actionable guidance to help you: Minimize legal risk and avoid costly mistakes Improve operational compliance Protect your property's interests Maintain positive tenant relationships Navigate challenging situations confidently Perfect for property managers, leasing professionals, maintenance supervisors, and other multifamily housing staff. Participants will receive comprehensive materials and be able to ask questions about real-world scenarios. This opportunity will strengthen your understanding of Virginia landlord-tenant law and enhance your property management expertise. These sessions are part of the year-long collaboration between A. J. Johnson and MidAtlantic AHMA and are designed to provide affordable housing professionals with the knowledge needed to effectively manage the complex requirements of the various agencies overseeing these programs. Persons interested in any (or all) training sessions may register by visiting either www.ajjcs.net or https://www.mid-atlanticahma.org.

Read full story

HUD Strengthens Tenant Protections in New HOME Rule

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published the Final Rule for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which will take effect on February 5, 2025. The new rule significantly enhances tenant protections and lease requirements, establishing a robust framework for tenant rights and landlord responsibilities. Enhanced Lease Requirements The Final Rule mandates that property owners provide written leases with a minimum one-year term, though shorter periods are permissible if mutually agreed upon. These leases must incorporate a HOME tenancy addendum and include multiple communication methods for tenant-owner interaction. The participating jurisdiction's contact information must also be clearly stated in the lease agreement. Physical Condition Standards Property owners face stricter property maintenance and repair requirements under the new rule. They must: Maintain units and projects in compliance with property standards and local codes Provide written timeframes for maintenance and repairs Refrain from charging tenants for normal wear and tear Relocate tenants to suitable housing if life-threatening deficiencies cannot be immediately addressed Tenant Rights and Protections The rule significantly expands tenant rights, including: Use and Occupancy Rights Exclusive use and occupancy of their units Reasonable access to common areas Right to organize tenant associations Protection against unreasonable entry, requiring advance notice except in emergencies Legal and Administrative Protections Right to independent legal representation Access to jury trials and appeals Protection against unauthorized seizure of personal property Safeguards against retaliation for exercising tenant rights Confidentiality of personal information Notice Requirements The rule strengthens notification requirements, mandating that owners: Provide written notice before any adverse actions Notify tenants of ownership or management changes Give at least 30 days' notice before property sales or foreclosures Issue written notices specifying grounds for adverse actions Security Deposits and Termination Security Deposit Regulations Deposits cannot exceed two months' rent Must be fully refundable Owners must itemize any charges against the deposit Unused portions must be promptly refunded Termination Procedures Termination is permitted only for serious lease violations, legal infractions, or good cause. Minimum 30-day notice required for termination Exception for immediate threats to safety or property Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity The Final Rule reinforces compliance requirements with all applicable non-discrimination and equal opportunity regulations, ensuring fair treatment of all tenants regardless of protected characteristics. Compliance Timeline Property owners and participating jurisdictions must implement these enhanced protections by February 5, 2025, when the Final Rule takes effect. This timeline ensures adequate preparation for the new requirements while maintaining continuous tenant protections during the transition period.

Read full story

HUD Publishes Final Rule Updating HOME Regulations

HUD's HOME Investment Partnerships Program (also known as the HOME program or HOME) provides formula grants to states and local government units to support various activities to produce and maintain affordable rental and homeownership housing. The program also offers tenant-based rental assistance for low-income and very low-income households. This final rule updates the current HOME regulations to enhance, simplify, and streamline requirements, better align the program with other federal housing programs, and implement recent amendments to the HOME statute. Additionally, this final rule includes minor revisions to the regulations for the Community Development Block Grant and Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Programs, consistent with the changes to the HOME program. This final rule follows the publication of a proposed rule on May 29, 2024, and incorporates the feedback received regarding that proposed rule. This final rule will be effective on February 5, 2025. The rule changes for the HOME program have been made in the following general areas: Tenant Protections and Lease Requirements: Enhanced tenant protections, including requirements for lease contents, notice provisions, tenant rights, prohibitions on unreasonable interference or retaliation by owners, and ensuring tenants' rights to organize and access common areas. Property Standards and Inspections: Updated property standards for new construction, rehabilitation, and ongoing property conditions, including requirements for carbon monoxide and smoke detection, disaster mitigation, green building standards, and revised inspection procedures and frequency requirements. Affordability and Income Determinations: Adjusted periods of affordability based on the amount of HOME funds invested, updated income determination methods, streamlined income determination processes, and provisions for accepting income determinations from other Federal or State programs. Tenant-Based Rental Assistance (TBRA): Revised requirements for rental assistance contracts, including terms, amendments, renewals, and income determinations, with enhanced tenant protections and lease addendum requirements. Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs): Revised CHDO qualification requirements, roles in owning, developing, and sponsoring housing, and provisions for capacity building and operating expenses. Homeownership Assistance: Updated homeownership value limits, resale and recapture provisions, requirements for lease-purchase programs, and adjusted periods of affordability for homeownership assistance. Environmental, Health, and Safety Hazards: Requirements for notifying tenants and participating jurisdictions of environmental, health, or safety hazards affecting projects or units. Program Administration and Compliance: Changes to the closeout process, recordkeeping requirements, corrective and remedial actions, and adjustments to the applicability of uniform administrative requirements and provisions for reallocations by formula. Security Deposits and Fees: Prohibitions on using surety bonds or security deposit insurance in lieu of security deposits, and requirements for refundable security deposits and allowable fees. Green Building and Resiliency: Incentives for projects meeting green building standards, allowing jurisdictions to exceed maximum per-unit subsidy limits for such projects. Utility Allowances and Rent Limits: Flexibility in determining utility allowances using HUD-approved methods and aligning rent limits with other Federal and State rental assistance programs. Financial Oversight: Annual examination of the financial condition of projects with 10 or more HOME-assisted units to ensure continued economic viability. Tenant Selection and Marketing: Requirements for written tenant selection policies, affirmative marketing, and nondiscrimination compliance. Project Costs and Eligible Activities: This section clarifies eligible project costs, including pre-development costs, environmental assessments, and using HOME funds for acquisition through ground leases. Administrative and Planning Costs: Provisions reimbursing administrative and planning costs, including project inspections and monitoring costs. While the changes are essential and must be fully understood by Participating Jurisdictions, since my practice focuses on affordable rental housing, I will also focus on that in the articles I post about them. Due to the complexity of the final rule, which is more than 500 pages, I will provide articles on the changes affecting multifamily housing complexes using HOME funds. Over the next few weeks, I will post articles on the following areas of the final rule. (1) Tenant Protections & Lease Requirements, (2) Property Standards & Inspections, (3) Affordability and Income Determinations, (4) Security Deposits & Fees, (5) Utility Allowances & Rent Limits, and (6) Tenant Selection & Marketing. These articles will assist owners and managers of rental properties with HOME funds to understand the new rules that will impact projects that obtain HOME funding beginning on February 5, 2025. If you know of an industry professional who may benefit from these articles, please encourage them to log into our website and sign up to receive automatic notification of future articles. They can subscribe to our articles by visiting our website (ajjcs.net), clicking "news, and then "subscribe in the lower right corner.

Read full story

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.