Democratic Control of Executive and Legislative Branches Increase Chances for Affordable Housing Initiatives

person A.J. Johnson today 01/17/2021

Since Senators-elect Reverend Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff won the January 5 Georgia run-off elections, the Senate will be evenly divided between 50 Republicans and 50 Democrats. Vice-President-elect Kamala Harris will decide the outcome of any tied votes through her role as President of the Senate, giving Democrats the majority. With Democrats winning control of the Senate, 2021 offers a good chance for advances in affordable housing legislation.

The majority status of the Democrats means they will have the leadership of the full Senate and all committees, the ability to set the Senate floor agenda and more easily confirm Biden administration nominees, and the ability to take advantage of the budget reconciliation process. This allows the controlling party to bypass filibuster rules (which require 60 votes to pass legislation) and pass certain types of legislation with a simple majority.

The control of the Senate also means the Biden administration will have an easier path to enacting components of its comprehensive housing plan that calls for a $640 billion investment over ten years, including strengthening and expanding the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program, provision of Housing Choice Vouchers to all eligible families, creating a new renter’s tax credit, and providing a new $100 billion affordable housing fund.

With regard to the LIHTC program, the Biden Affordable Housing Plan calls for expanding the LIHTC with a $10 billion investment. This will be designed to make the credit more efficient, dramatically increasing the number of new or rehabilitated affordable housing units. The Plan will also ensure that urban, suburban, and rural areas all benefit from the LIHTC.

Following are some of the major elements of the Biden Housing Plan that now stand a much greater chance of moving forward:

  • End redlining and other discriminatory housing practices. The Biden Plan includes a Homeowner & Renter Bill of Rights that will expand protections for renters, including a law prohibiting landlords from refusing to accept vouchers. The mechanism for this would be a revision to the Fair Housing Act, adding "Source of Income" as a new protection.
  • Tenant eviction protection will be pushed with the passage of The Legal Assistance to Prevent Evictions Act of 2020. This will assist tenants facing eviction in obtaining legal assistance.
  • The elimination of local and state housing regulations that perpetuate discrimination - specifically exclusionary zoning. Biden’s proposed legislation would require any state or locality receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds or (more significantly) Surface Transportation Block Grants to develop a strategy for inclusionary zoning and will fund states to assist them in eliminating exclusionary zoning policies. This is a particularly important proposal, especially the withholding of transportation funds. While not all localities use CDBG money, virtually every city and state want to share in the federal transportation funds. The inability to build new roads or improve highways would be a major issue for localities and the potential withholding of such funds would be a serious "stick" in the push for inclusionary zoning. This could open up substantial new urban areas for the development of affordable rental housing.
  • Strengthen the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) to ensure that non-bank financial service institutions (e.g., mortgage and insurance companies) serve all communities.
  • Provide downpayment assistance through a refundable and advanceable tax credit of $15,000 and fully fund the Housing Choice Voucher and Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) programs. Under this proposal, Housing Choice Vouchers would be made available to every eligible household. Currently, 75% of eligible families do not receive assistance. This, along with fully funding the PBRA programs, would provide assistance to 17 million households.
  • Creation of a new renter’s tax credit, designed to reduce rent and utilities to 30% of income for families who make too much money to qualify for rental assistance.
  • Expand housing benefits for first responders, public school teachers, and other public and national service workers who commit to living in persistently impoverished communities. This program would provide additional down-payment assistance and low-interest rehab loans.
  • Establish a $100 billion Affordable Housing Fund to construct and upgrade affordable housing - primarily in areas with a short supply of affordable housing.
  • Increase funding for the HOME program by $5 billion.
  • Increase funding for the Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Program by $20 billion.
  • Expand the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC) by $10 billion.
  • Increase funding for repairs to the Rural Development Section 515 Program.

Most of these proposal will require Congressional action, so the issue of who controls Congress is no small thing. Now that the Democrats control the Senate, the chance for passage of Biden’s plan increases.

Impact on Agencies

As with any change in administrations, the top leadership of both HUD and Agriculture will change. An additional factor is that during the past four years, many agency professionals have retired or resigned; these positions are harder to replace than the political appointees.  Having said that, the appointment of qualified leadership can go a long way in attracting qualified professionals and retaining those that are there. President-Elect Biden has named his choices to head HUD and Agriculture.

Secretary of Housing & Urban Development (HUD)

President-elect Biden has nominated Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH) to lead HUD.

HUD will play a key role in the incoming administration’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has caused millions of people to fall behind on rent and mortgage payments.

If confirmed, which is highly likely, Rep. Fudge will take over amid an acute housing crisis, as millions of tenants walloped by the pandemic-driven economic crisis face eviction and massive back-rent bills. The Biden administration is expected to push for Congress to pass a relief package dedicating billions of dollars to rent relief, and HUD will likely seek additional funding to address homelessness.

Fair housing will also be a priority. The Biden transition lists "racial equity" as a Day One priority, alongside COVID-19, the economic crisis and climate change. The gap in homeownership rates between white and Black Americans has never been wider, a key driver of the persistent racial wealth gap.

Among the new secretary’s first tasks will be restoration of the 2015 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule, which outgoing HUD Secretary Ben Carson revoked this past summer. The original rule - which the Obama administration introduced as a way to beef up enforcement of the Fair Housing Act - would have required local governments to track patterns of segregation with a checklist of 92 questions in order to gain access to federal housing funds.

The AFFH was not the only fair housing rule that the Trump administration has tried to gut. Carson’s HUD also introduced a regulation revamping the Agency’s 2013 "disparate impact" rule to make it harder to prove unintentional discrimination. A federal judge in October issued a preliminary injunction to stop HUD from implementing the new rule, which would have required plaintiffs to meet a higher threshold to prove unintentional discrimination, known as disparate impact, and given defendants more leeway to rebut the claims. It is likely that HUD, under Fudge, will return to a more neutral disparate impact test.

The naming of Fudge has resulted in an immediate improvement in the morale at HUD, which has deteriorated under the leadership of Ben Carson. Under Fudge, other initiatives of the Trump/Carson era will certainly be rolled back, including (1) the anti-Transgender rule changes to the Equal Access Rule, and (2) elimination of the proposal to force mixed-status immigrant families to separate or face eviction from HUD-assisted housing.

As for the Department of Agriculture, which oversees the rural housing programs, Biden has selected Tom Vilsack, who was the Agriculture Secretary under President Obama. Vilsack served as governor of Iowa from 1999 to 2007 and served as Agriculture Secretary for both of Obama’s terms. Since then, he has been a lobbying executive for the dairy industry. While not a popular choice among environmentalists, Vilsack was supportive of the RD housing programs, although he was not an aggressive advocate. His presence is unlikely to slow down the current push to roll RD housing programs into HUD.

In the not-to-distant future, the efforts to revise America’s approach to affordable housing will begin. It is certain that greater priority will be given to affordable housing over the next four years than during the most recent four years.

Latest Articles

Impact of Trump Administration's Regulatory Restructuring on HUD and IRS

The Trump administration's recent executive order on federal regulations, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative," signals significant changes for federal agencies. The order has particularly notable implications for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The New Regulatory Framework On February 19, 2025, President Trump signed this executive order as part of a broader deregulatory agenda aimed at reducing what the administration views as bureaucratic overreach. The directive mandates that federal agencies conduct a comprehensive 60-day review of their regulatory frameworks to ensure alignment with both legal requirements and administration policies. The order targets explicitly regulations considered: Unconstitutional Based on improper delegations of legislative power Imposing excessive costs without clear public benefits Harmful to national interests Hindering development across various sectors This order is part of a series of regulatory rollbacks, including directives like "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies" and "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation," which expand upon the administration's previous deregulatory efforts. Specific Impacts on the IRS The IRS faces several significant challenges under this new directive: Continued Hiring Freeze: The executive order maintains an existing hiring freeze at the IRS, which will remain in effect until the Treasury Secretary, in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director, determines that lifting it serves the national interest. Increased White House Oversight: IRS regulations will once again be subject to White House review through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), reinstating a policy from Trump's first term that adds another layer of scrutiny to IRS rulemaking. "10-for-1" Deregulation Mandate: The IRS must eliminate ten existing guidance documents for every new rule or guidance it issues, significantly constraining its ability to update tax regulations and provide new guidance. These measures could substantially impact the IRS's capacity to uphold compliance and maintain operational efficiency, potentially affecting tax administration and enforcement nationwide. Implications for HUD For the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the executive order brings equally significant changes: Comprehensive Program Review: The order requires a review of hundreds of HUD programs, potentially leading to significant restructuring or budget cuts. Grant Funding Uncertainty: Although a federal court temporarily blocked a separate memo seeking to freeze federal grants, the administration's intent to reassess HUD funding remains evident. "10-for-1" Rule Application: Like the IRS, HUD must adhere to the requirement of eliminating ten existing regulations for every new one proposed, which could significantly impact housing policy implementation and program management. These changes may affect HUD's ability to administer housing assistance programs, enforce fair housing regulations, and support community development initiatives. Legal and Procedural Challenges The administration's deregulatory push faces potential legal obstacles: Agencies seeking to rescind or modify rules must generally follow a new rulemaking process, including issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, collecting public comments, and finalizing the new rule. Failure to adhere to these procedural requirements could expose regulatory rollbacks to legal challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA requires agencies to engage in reasoned decision-making when modifying or rescinding regulations, and courts may overturn agency decisions if this standard is not met. Outlook As the 60-day review period progresses, the IRS and HUD must navigate competing demands: implementing the administration's deregulatory agenda while maintaining their core functions and avoiding legal challenges. The outcome will likely reshape how these agencies operate and could have lasting implications for the United States s tax administration and housing policy. The full impact of these changes will become more evident as agencies determine which regulations to target and how to implement the administration's directives while fulfilling their statutory obligations.

Understanding the HOTMA Educational Assistance Rules

Under the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA), specific rules govern how educational assistance is treated as income for Section 8 residents. HOTMA Educational Assistance Rule Overview HOTMA clarified and simplified the treatment of educational assistance in determining a household s income for many affordable housing programs, including most HUD programs, Rural Development Section 515, and the LIHTC program. Under the HOTMA rule: Exclusion of Educational Assistance:Most forms of educational assistance, including scholarships, grants, and work-study income, are excluded from the calculation of annual income. This exclusion applies to both the student and other household members. Limited Exceptions:The only types of educational assistance that may be counted as income are: Amounts exceeding the actual tuition cost, fees, books, and other required educational expenses. Payments for living expenses (e.g., housing, food, and transportation) that are included in the educational assistance package. Student Status and Eligibility: The rule applies to both dependent students and independent students. The educational assistance exclusion is broader for students under Section 8 over 23 with dependent children and generally includes all aid except for amounts used for living expenses. HOTMA s goal in modifying these rules was to reduce administrative complexity and ensure that educational aid meant to support academic success does not create a financial penalty for low-income families participating in HUD programs. Amounts Received Under Section 479B of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965 Educational assistance received under the Higher Education Act is almost always excluded from income even if it exceeds the cost of actual educational expenses. The one exception is for Section 8 residents, where the full amount of educational assistance in excess of actual expenses is included in income. The one exception to this is for Section 8 residents over age 23 with dependent children. HEA assistance is always excluded for this category of resident, as it is for residents in all other affordable housing programs subject to HOTMA. Section 479B provides that certain types of student financial assistance are excluded in determining eligibility for benefits made available through federal, state, or local programs financed with federal funds. The types of financial assistance listed below are considered 479B student financial assistance programs. Federal Pell Grants Teach Grants Federal Work-Study Programs Federal Perkins Grants Student Financial Assistance received under the Bureau of Indian Education Higher Education Tribal Grants Tribally Controlled Colleges or Universities Grant Program Employment Training Program under Section 134 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Any other awards under Section 479B Other student financial assistance may also be excluded from income, but only to the extent it pays for actual educational expenses. Such assistance includes grants or scholarships from the following sources: Federal government A State (including U.S. territories), Tribe, or local government A private foundation registered as a non-profit under 26 USC 501(c)(3) A business entity (such as a corporation, general partnership, limited liability company, limited partnership, joint venture, business trust, public benefit corporation, or non-profit entity). An institution of higher education Military assistance (e.g., GI Bill) Other monetary contributions will generally not be excluded from income, and may include - Financial support provided to a student in the form of a fee for services performed (e.g., work-study or teaching fellowship) that is not excluded under Section 479B of the HEA. Gifts, including gifts from family or friends. Covered Costs Costs that may be considered educational expenses include: Tuition Books Supplies Room Board Fees required and charged to a student by an institution of higher education. Property managers operating properties subject to HOTMA need to be familiar with the various types of financial assistance students will likely receive and whether or not such assistance may be excluded from income. Bottom Line The Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA) streamlines the treatment of educational assistance as income for residents receiving housing support, such as Section 8. In general, most forms of educational assistance, including scholarships and grants, are excluded from income calculations for both the student and their household members. There are limited exceptions, which include amounts that exceed tuition costs and payments designated for living expenses. This rule applies to both dependent and independent students, with more extensive exclusions for Section 8 students over 23 who have dependents. HOTMA seeks to reduce administrative burdens and ensure that educational aid does not financially penalize low-income families.

Executive Order Establishes English as Official U.S. Language: Impact on HUD Programs

President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order on March 1, 2025, establishing English as the official language of the United States. This move has significant implications for federal agencies and their communication policies, especially for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Rural Development properties. Key Changes The Executive Order revokes Executive Order 13166, issued on August 11, 2000. That previous order mandated federal agencies, including HUD, to implement Limited English Proficiency (LEP) policies for their programs. Under the previous order, agencies were required to ensure that individuals with limited English proficiency could access their services. With the revocation, HUD will no longer mandate LEP policies for owners and Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) in HUD-assisted properties. Current Status and Recommendations It's important to note that the new Executive Order does not prohibit federal agencies from producing documents in languages besides English. However, they will no longer be legally obligated to do so. No immediate action is necessary for HUD and Rural Development property owners and managers who currently have LEP policies in place. I recommend maintaining current policies until formal guidance is issued. Both HUD and Rural Development are expected to provide official guidance on this change in the coming weeks or months. Project operators are advised to await this guidance before implementing any changes to their existing language access policies. Looking Ahead This policy shift signifies a substantial change in federal language requirements. Housing providers should remain informed about upcoming agency guidance that will clarify expectations and requirements going forward. Once formal guidance is released, property managers and owners should consult with their industry associations and legal advisors to ensure compliance. This article offers informational content based on current developments and should not be interpreted as legal advice. Property owners and managers should seek guidance from qualified legal professionals regarding specific compliance issues.

HUD Extends NSPIRE Affirmative Standards Compliance Deadline to October 2025

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development s (HUD) Real Estate Assessment Center (REAC) has announced an extension of the compliance deadline for the National Standards for the Physical Inspection of Real Estate (NSPIRE) affirmative requirements. Initially planned for earlier implementation, the new deadline of October 1, 2025, gives property owners and managers in the Public Housing and Multifamily Housing programs extra time to align their properties with the updated standards. Background and Rationale for Extension The decision to extend the compliance period was influenced by the challenges property owners and managers encountered in meeting the new requirements. HUD recognizes the complexity of these updates and the operational adjustments needed, so it has opted to provide a grace period, allowing property stakeholders to address any deficiencies without immediate penalty. While property inspections conducted during this period will still identify deficiencies, they will not adversely affect inspection scores until the new deadline. Instead, flagged issues will be marked with a caret (^) symbol, indicating non-compliance that must be addressed before the final implementation date. It s important to note that the extension does not change HUD s existing policies regarding traditionally non-scored deficiencies. This means that requirements related to smoke detectors, carbon monoxide (CO) detectors, handrails, and call-for-aid devices remain unchanged and must continue to be addressed according to HUD s existing standards. Key Affirmative Requirements Under NSPIRE The NSPIRE affirmative requirements encompass a wide array of safety and habitability standards aimed at improving the quality of housing for tenants. These requirements pertain to various aspects of property maintenance, including site conditions, individual unit standards, building interiors, and exterior features. Below is a summary of the essential requirements: Site-Specific Requirements Installation of fire-labeled doors Electrical safety improvements, such as the installation of Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters (GFCI) and Arc Fault Circuit Interrupters (AFCI) are essential. Guardrails for elevated surfaces HVAC system compliance with specified standards Adequate interior lighting levels Minimum electrical and lighting standards to ensure habitability Detailed Unit Requirements Provision of hot and cold running water in bathrooms and kitchens Private bathroom facilities with required fixtures Properly installed smoke detectors in designated locations Special accommodations for hearing-impaired residents, including visual alert devices CO alarms installed per safety regulations Designated living room and kitchen area standards Electrical outlet and lighting provisions for Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) and Project-Based Voucher (PBV) program units GFCI protection in areas near water sources Adequate heating sources to maintain comfortable indoor temperatures Guardrails for elevated surfaces within units Fixed lighting in kitchens and bathrooms for enhanced visibility Building Interior Requirements Smoke detectors installed on each level of the property CO alarms strategically placed to maximize safety GFCI protection in locations with potential water exposure Guardrails for all elevated walking areas Permanently mounted lighting fixtures to improve illumination Restrictions on the use of unvented space heaters to mitigate fire hazards Exterior Requirements GFCI protection for outdoor outlets near water sources Guardrails for elevated exterior walking paths to prevent accidents Preparing for Full Implementation While the extended deadline postpones the enforcement of compliance-related penalties, property owners and managers should take advantage of this time to proactively address deficiencies and make necessary upgrades. By acting now, property stakeholders can ensure a smoother transition when the standards fully take effect in October 2025. The primary goal of these affirmative requirements is to enhance property resilience and increase tenant safety. By following these updated standards, property owners help create a healthier and more secure living environment for residents. HUD strongly encourages proactive compliance measures to prevent last-minute challenges and potential non-compliance issues when the deadline arrives. With this extension, HUD acknowledges the challenges housing providers face while reinforcing its commitment to uphold high standards of housing quality and tenant protection. Property owners and managers should use the extra time to assess, plan, and implement necessary improvements to ensure full compliance by the October 2025 deadline.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.