HUD Provides Guidance on Non-Rent Fees for Subsidized Multifamily Housing Programs

person A.J. Johnson today 03/16/2024

In February 2024, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provided guidance on existing policies regarding the fees that owners may and may not charge tenants. None of the guidance is new or reflects any change in HUD regulations. The purpose of the guidance is twofold: (1) to remind owners of the current requirements relative to fees and (2) to seek input from stakeholders on any possible changes to the requirements.

Following is an overview of existing HUD policy regarding fees in addition to rent.

  • Application Fees: Owners may not require fees or other costs to accept and process applications. These costs are considered project expenses.
  • Charges at Initial Occupancy: Owners may not collect any money from tenants at initial occupancy other than rent and the maximum HUD-allowed security deposit unless they receive HUD approval to do otherwise.
  • Pet Deposit: An owner of housing specifically designed for occupancy by the elderly and persons with disabilities may require tenants to pay a refundable pet deposit. The pet deposit applies only to tenants who own or keep cats or dogs in their units. HUD Handbook 4350.3 outlines the maximum amount of the pet deposit that may be charged by an owner on a per-unit basis.
    • An owner may use the pet deposit only to pay reasonable expenses directly attributable to the pet's presence on the property, including (but not limited to) the cost of repairs and replacements to, and fumigation of, the unit and the cost of animal care facilities. Owners must return the unused portion of a pet deposit to the tenant within a reasonable time after the tenant moves from the property or no longer owns or keeps a pet in the unit.
  • Screening Fees: Owners may not charge applicants for costs associated with screening applicants, including screening for criminal history or verifying income and eligibility. Hence, owners must not require applicants to pay credit report charges, charges for home visits, charges to obtain police reports or other costs associated with the above functions. These costs are considered project expenses.
  • Security Deposit: Owners may collect a security deposit during the initial lease execution. However, the owner must collect a refundable security deposit at the time of the initial lease execution for the following programs:
    • Section 8 New Construction with an AHAP executed on or after November 5, 1979;
    • Section 8 Substantial Rehabilitation with an AHAP executed on or after February 20, 1980;
    • Section 8 State Agency with an AHAP executed on or after February 29, 1980;
    • Section 202/8;
    • Section 202 PAC;
    • Section 202 PRAC; and
    • Section 811 PRAC.

Owners may collect the security deposit on an installment basis. The security deposit amount established at move-in does not change when a tenant’s rent changes. The amount of the security deposit to be collected is dependent upon:

  1. The type of housing program;
  2. The date the AHAP or HAP contract for the unit was signed and
  3. The amount of the total tenant payment or tenant rent.

The HUD Handbook 4350.3, Figure 6-7, outlines the security deposit amount that may be collected for each program.

When a tenant transfers to a new unit, an owner may:

  1. Transfer the security deposit, or
  2. Charge a new deposit and refund the deposit for the old unit.
  1. Assistance Animals: Owners may not require an applicant or tenant to pay a fee or a security deposit as a condition of allowing the applicant or tenant to keep an assistance animal. However, if an assistance animal causes damage to the unit or common areas of the dwelling, the owner may charge the individual for the cost of repairing the damage if the owner regularly charges tenants for any damage they cause to the premises.
  2. Attorney/Legal Costs: There may be no lease provision that the tenant agrees to pay all attorney and other legal costs if the owner brings legal action against the tenant, even if the tenant prevails.  However, as a party to a lawsuit, a tenant may be obligated to pay attorney’s fees or other costs if the tenant loses the suit.
    1. Owners may accept payment of court filing, attorney, and sheriff fees from tenants who wish to avoid or settle an eviction suit provided it is permitted under state and local laws, and the fees appear reasonable and do not exceed the actual costs incurred.
  3. Bad Behavior: Owners may not charge tenants for bad behavior, such as foul language, noise, or failure to supervise children.
  4. Checks Returned for Insufficient Funds: Owners may impose a fee on the second time, and each additional time thereafter, a check is not honored for payment. The owner may bill a tenant only for the amount the bank charges for processing the returned check.
    1. HUD or a Contract Administrator (CA) may authorize additional charges if such charges are consistent with local management practices and are permitted under state and local law.
    1. Owners of Section 202/8, Section 202 PAC, Section 202 PRAC, and Section 811 PRAC projects may never charge fees for checks returns for insufficient funds.
  5. Damages: Whenever damage is caused by carelessness, misuse, or neglect by the tenant, household member, or visitor, the tenant is obligated to reimburse the owner within 30 days of receiving a bill from the owner. The owner’s bill is limited to actual and reasonable costs incurred by the owner for repairing the damages.
  6. Facilities & Services: Owners may not charge tenants separately for equipment and services included in the rent. Owners may charge tenants for other services or facilities (e.g., cable TV or use of community space in the project) only if all of the following conditions are met:
    1. Part C of the most recently approved rent schedule includes the services, facilities, and charges.
    1. A schedule of those charges has been posted or distributed to the tenants.
    1. The tenant can use those facilities or services if they are optional.
    1. If not previously authorized, the charges must be approved by HUD before implementation.

Owners may charge for parking only in unsubsidized projects where HUD previously approved it. They may also charge for car heaters in cold climates where parking spaces are equipped with them.

  • Infestation Treatment: Owners may not charge a tenant for the extermination cost unless the owner can demonstrate that the tenant's carelessness or neglect caused the infestation.
  • Keys & Lockouts: Owners may charge tenants for answering lock-out calls and providing extra keys. At the time of move-out, the owner may charge the tenant for unreturned keys.
  • Late Payment of Rent: Owners may charge a late fee if the tenant has been given at least five calendar days as a grace period to pay the rent. The rent must be received by the fifth day, not postmarked on that day. On the sixth day, the owner may charge a fee not to exceed $5.00 for the period of the first through fifth day that the rent is not paid. After that, the owner may charge a fee of $1.00 per day for each additional day the rent remains unpaid for the month.
    • HUD or CAs may approve a higher initial late fee if (1) it is permitted under state and local laws, (2) it is consistent with local management practices, and (3) the total late charge assessed for the month does not exceed $30.00.

An owner may deduct accrued, unpaid late charges from the security deposit at the time of move-out if such a deduction is permitted under state and local laws. An owner may not evict a tenant for failure to pay late charges.

Owners of Section 202/8, Section 202 PAC, Section 202 PRAC, and Section 811 PRAC projects may never charge late rent payment fees.

  • Meals Fee: Owners of properties for the elderly or persons with disabilities for which HUD approved a mandatory meals program before April 1, 1987, may charge a HUD-approved meals fee. The tenants pay such costs, and the fees are not rent.
  • Meeting Space for Tenant Organizations: An owner may charge a reasonable fee, approved by HUD, as may normally be imposed for using such facilities in accordance with procedures prescribed by HUD for the use of meeting space.
  • Other Charges: Owners may require tenants to pay other charges if:
    • HUD or CA has approved the charges, and
    • The schedule of charges is either:
      • Listed in the lease agreement or
      • Has been distributed to all tenants in accordance with the modification of the lease requirements and procedures listed in paragraph 6-12D of Handbook 4350.3.

HUD’s Office of Multifamily Housing Programs is seeking feedback from stakeholders regarding these policies. Owners and Agents of affected programs may provide comments and feedback to HUD at AssetManagementPolicy@HUD.gov. Responses are due by March 29, 2024.

Latest Articles

HUD Extends HOTMA Compliance Deadline for Community Planning and Development Programs to 2026

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has announced an extension of the compliance deadline for implementing specific provisions of the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA) final rule for Community Planning and Development (CPD) programs. This extension will be official when published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2024. Key Points: The extension applies to multiple programs including HOME Investment Partnerships, HOME-American Rescue Plan, Housing Trust Fund (HTF), Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA), Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), Emergency Solution Grants (ESG), and Continuum of Care (CoC) programs. CPD grantees must comply with the HOTMA final rule by January 1, 2026, but they may choose to implement the changes earlier, starting from January 1, 2024. HUD cited delays in updating its systems and the need to provide grantees additional time to incorporate new income and asset requirements into their programs as reasons for the extension. Safe Harbor Provisions: The notice also allows certain CPD grantees to implement income safe harbor provisions before the extended compliance date: HOPWA, ESG, and CoC program grantees may use the safe harbor provision at 24 CFR 5.609(c)(3). HOME and HTF grantees can implement specific safe harbor provisions under their regulations. Grantees must update their program guidelines and establish appropriate policies before using these provisions. Background: This extension follows earlier announcements affecting other HUD programs: In September 2024, the Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH) announced that Public Housing Agencies would not need to implement certain HOTMA provisions by January 2025. The Office of Housing issued a similar notification extending the deadline to July 1, 2025 for multifamily owners. Until their new compliance dates, CPD grantees must continue following existing regulations as they were before January 1, 2024, while having the option to implement the new safe harbor provisions described in the notice. The extension aims to ensure a smoother transition to the new requirements while reducing the administrative burden on grantees who may otherwise need to maintain two different income requirements for the same units.

Rural Development Updates Form 3560-8, Tenant Income Certification

On December 10, 2024, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) announced an updated Form RD 3560-8 Tenant Certification for the July 1, 2025, implementation of the changes to income and asset calculations due to the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA).  On October 3, 2024, RHS Multifamily Housing extended the implementation of applicable HOTMA regulations to July 1, 2025.  Effective on or after July 1, 2025, all MFH tenant certifications must comply with HOTMA requirements. Rural Development has updated Form RD 3560-8 Tenant Certification to accommodate HOTMA changes. The revised Form was published on December 06, 2024, and is available on the United States Department of Agriculture s (USDA) eForms website. Since tenant certifications can be submitted to the Agency up to 90 days before their effective date, please note the following: The updated Form RD 3560-8 is for tenant certifications with an effective date of July 1, 2025, or after. The previous Form RD 3560-8 has been renamed Form RD 3560-8A and will be used for tenant certifications effective before July 1, 2025. Both forms can be found on the eForms website. For previously published Rural Development guidance related to HOTMA, please refer to the following: Unnumbered Letter published March 4, 2024 Unnumbered Letter published August 19, 2024 MFH Stakeholder Announcement HOTMA Implementation update October 3, 2024 Unnumbered Letter published November 14, 2024 (Passbook Savings Rate update)

Trump Nominates Scott Turner as HUD Secretary

In a significant move relating to affordable housing, former President Donald Trump has nominated Scott Turner as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Known for his leadership and commitment to community development, Turner brings a dynamic blend of experiences to the role. Scott Turner is an American politician and former professional football player who has served in various public service roles. He played as a defensive back in the NFL from 1995 to 2003 with the Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers, and Denver Broncos. After his NFL career, Turner entered politics in Texas. From 2013 to 2019, he served as a Republican in the Texas House of Representatives for District 33. During his time in the state legislature, he focused on economic development and education initiatives. In 2019, Turner was appointed Executive Director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council under President Trump. There, he implemented and oversaw Opportunity Zones across the country, a program designed to spur economic development and job creation in economically distressed communities. Turner has been known for focusing on economic development, particularly in underserved communities, and has frequently spoken about the importance of creating pathways to prosperity through public-private partnerships. As HUD Secretary, Turner s priorities are expected to align with his previous initiatives. These include expanding affordable housing options, strengthening public-private partnerships to revitalize urban areas, and addressing systemic challenges such as homelessness and housing insecurity. His nomination comes at a critical time as the nation grapples with escalating housing costs, supply shortages, and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations. Supporters of Turner s nomination laud his hands-on approach and ability to engage with local leaders, community organizations, and private investors to drive meaningful progress. However, critics have raised concerns about the long-term impacts of Opportunity Zones, particularly regarding potential displacement and gentrification in some areas. Turner s ability to address these concerns while fostering equitable development will likely be a focal point during his confirmation hearings. Senate confirmation of Turner is expected, and no significant objections to the appointment have yet been raised.

Treasury Posts Support of HFA Disincentives for Qualified Contracts

In a December 12, 2024 post, the U.S. Department of Treasury expressed strong support for Housing Finance Agency (HFA) attempts to prevent or limit qualified contract requests for LIHTC projects. According to recent Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies data, the United States is facing an unprecedented housing affordability crisis. Record numbers of renters spend over 30% of their income on housing and utilities. As housing costs continue to climb in the wake of the pandemic, preserving existing affordable housing stock has become increasingly critical. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program is the federal government's primary tool for expanding the affordable housing supply. Between 2000 and 2019, it supported approximately 25% of new apartment construction. However, a provision known as the Qualified Contract option threatens to prematurely remove thousands of units each year from the affordable housing inventory. Understanding the Qualified Contract Challenge The Qualified Contract provision, introduced in 1989, was designed to encourage private investment in affordable housing by offering property owners an early exit option. After 14 years, owners can request their state housing agency find a buyer willing to pay a statutorily defined price. If no qualified buyer emerges within a year, the property can convert to market-rate housing despite the original 30-year affordability commitment. This mechanism has led to significant losses in affordable housing stock. Current estimates indicate that 6,000-10,000 low-income units are lost annually through Qualified Contracts, with cumulative losses reaching approximately 115,000. The problem has intensified recently as the statutory pricing formula often exceeds market value, making it difficult for agencies to secure buyers willing to maintain affordability restrictions. State-Level Solutions State housing agencies have implemented various strategies to address this challenge: Mandatory Waivers Many states now require LIHTC applicants to waive their Qualified Contract rights as a prerequisite for receiving tax credits. North Dakota and Nevada exemplify this approach, making such waivers mandatory for new applications. The Treasury Department strongly endorses these policies and encourages their application across 4% and 9% LIHTC programs. Incentive-Based Approaches Some states have adopted point-based systems to encourage longer affordability commitments. Georgia's program, for instance, awards developers incremental points based on the duration of their Qualified Contract waiver: one point for a 5-year waiver, two points for 10 years, and three points for a complete waiver. Deterrence Measures States have also implemented policies discouraging Qualified Contract requests from existing LIHTC property owners. These measures include: Disqualifying applicants with a history of Qualified Contract requests (Maine, North Carolina) Assigning negative points to applicants who have previously pursued Qualified Contract exits (Indiana, Kansas, New Hampshire) Awarding bonus points to applicants who have never requested a Qualified Contract (South Carolina) Federal Support and Coordination Federal agencies are aligning their policies to reinforce these state-level efforts: HUD has proposed restricting FHA Multifamily and Risk Share insurance access to owners who waive Qualified Contract rights. The Federal Housing Finance Agency now prohibits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from investing in properties that retain Qualified Contract options. The USDA's Rural Housing Service is developing complementary measures. Looking Forward The Treasury Department strongly supports state and federal initiatives to limit the use of Qualified Contracts and preserve affordable housing. These coordinated efforts are a crucial component of the administration's comprehensive strategy to address the housing affordability and supply challenges facing American families. As housing costs strain household budgets nationwide, preserving existing affordable units through Qualified Contract restrictions becomes increasingly vital. State agencies' innovative approaches to this challenge demonstrate the potential for policy solutions that balance private sector participation with long-term affordability goals. This article reflects the Treasury's position on best practices in LIHTC administration as of December 2024. Please consult your state housing agency for the most current guidance and requirements.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.