HUD Provides Guidance on Requesting NSPIRE Appeals

person A.J. Johnson today 08/24/2024

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has received feedback from Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) and Property Owners/Agents (OAs) regarding issues encountered when submitting appeals in the NSPIRE IT system. To address this, HUD has made Technical Review Guidance available, providing a summary of the basis for technical review and instructions for submitting an appeal.

As a reminder, if an OA believes that a property’s inspection results and score should be reviewed for verifiable reasons, it may request a technical review. It should submit the request electronically through the NSPIRE system within 45 calendar days after HUD provides the inspection report.

A request for technical review must be accompanied by evidence supporting the claim. HUD recommends seeking a technical review only if the correction will significantly improve the property's overall score, such as an increase to 60 or above or a change in the inspection frequency.

Technical Review

A property can request a technical review of the inspection results and score. The technical review process allows PHAs and OAs to have points restored for verifiable reasons, including HUD or inspector error, adverse conditions beyond their control, modernization work in progress, and conflicts with state or local code. A request for a technical review of inspection results must be submitted electronically in the NSPIRE system. REAC must receive it by the 45th calendar day after HUD provides the inspection report to the PHA or OA.

Eligibility

A request for a technical review of inspection results must be accompanied by evidence supporting the claim. PHAs or OAs should only seek a technical review that will significantly improve the property's overall score if corrected. Significant improvement refers to an increase in a score for the property such that the new score crosses an administratively significant threshold, which may include an increase in the property score to 60 or above or a change in the inspection frequency.

Basis for Technical Review

  • Building Data Error: E.g., a property component (such as a building, common area, or sidewalk) does not belong to the owner. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Letter from a public authority (e.g., fire department, code enforcement officer, licensed contractor).
    • Surveys (performed by licensed professionals or issued by government entities).
    • Proof of ownership.
  • Adjustments for factors not reflected or inappropriately reflected in physical condition score: E.g., Local code contradicts NSPIRE standards. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Letter from a public authority (e.g., fire marshall,  Code enforcement officer, licensed professional).
    • Copy of official publication for the property location and applicable housing code.
  • Unit error count: An error in unit count affected the inspection sample size. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Data count from the source system.
  • Adjustments for adverse conditions beyond the control of the owner or PHA: For example, a natural disaster or circumstance beyond the property owner's control caused the defect. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Statement of nearby work and proof of damage caused to property (e.g., insurance claim, statement from government source).
  • A Non-existent Deficiency Error: E.g., The deficiency cited by the inspector does not apply to the observed condition, or the inspector noted the wrong defect. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Evaluation from a public authority, such as a fire Marshal, code enforcement officer, or licensed contractor.
    • Letter from a licensed professional.
  • Adjustments for modernization work in progress: For example, the defect cited is a result of a HUD-approved modernization or rehabilitation project that is underway. Acceptable evidence includes
    • Letter from HUD approving the work.
    • Work orders from a licensed professional.
    • Contracts (e.g., legal documentation with signature by the vendor responsible for the work).
    • Statement of start and completion dates.

Best Practices and Recommendations for Submitting Technical Reviews

Before submitting the appeal, review the NSPIRE standards for full details and scoring methodology. Clearly describe the basis for the appeal and ensure that supporting documentation is legible.

Do not submit documents that are unrelated to the specific deficiency that is being appealed.

To lodge an NSPIRE appeal with HUD, (1) log into the NSPIRE system; (2) select the Inspections tab; (3) Select an Inspection Name to open the inspection record; (4) Select "View all" under "ExAM Deficiencies;" (5) Select a deficiency name; (6) Select "Add/Remove from Appeal," (7) Select an Appeal Reason from the dropdown menu; and (8) Describe the error in the Property Appeals Comment field, and include supporting documentation.

If you have any questions, email HUD at NSPIRE@hud.gov or call the Technical Assistance Center (TAC) at 1-888-245-4860.

Latest Articles

Rural Development Updates Form 3560-8, Tenant Income Certification

On December 10, 2024, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) announced an updated Form RD 3560-8 Tenant Certification for the July 1, 2025, implementation of the changes to income and asset calculations due to the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA).  On October 3, 2024, RHS Multifamily Housing extended the implementation of applicable HOTMA regulations to July 1, 2025.  Effective on or after July 1, 2025, all MFH tenant certifications must comply with HOTMA requirements. Rural Development has updated Form RD 3560-8 Tenant Certification to accommodate HOTMA changes. The revised Form was published on December 06, 2024, and is available on the United States Department of Agriculture s (USDA) eForms website. Since tenant certifications can be submitted to the Agency up to 90 days before their effective date, please note the following: The updated Form RD 3560-8 is for tenant certifications with an effective date of July 1, 2025, or after. The previous Form RD 3560-8 has been renamed Form RD 3560-8A and will be used for tenant certifications effective before July 1, 2025. Both forms can be found on the eForms website. For previously published Rural Development guidance related to HOTMA, please refer to the following: Unnumbered Letter published March 4, 2024 Unnumbered Letter published August 19, 2024 MFH Stakeholder Announcement HOTMA Implementation update October 3, 2024 Unnumbered Letter published November 14, 2024 (Passbook Savings Rate update)

Trump Nominates Scott Turner as HUD Secretary

In a significant move relating to affordable housing, former President Donald Trump has nominated Scott Turner as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Known for his leadership and commitment to community development, Turner brings a dynamic blend of experiences to the role. Scott Turner is an American politician and former professional football player who has served in various public service roles. He played as a defensive back in the NFL from 1995 to 2003 with the Washington Redskins, San Diego Chargers, and Denver Broncos. After his NFL career, Turner entered politics in Texas. From 2013 to 2019, he served as a Republican in the Texas House of Representatives for District 33. During his time in the state legislature, he focused on economic development and education initiatives. In 2019, Turner was appointed Executive Director of the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council under President Trump. There, he implemented and oversaw Opportunity Zones across the country, a program designed to spur economic development and job creation in economically distressed communities. Turner has been known for focusing on economic development, particularly in underserved communities, and has frequently spoken about the importance of creating pathways to prosperity through public-private partnerships. As HUD Secretary, Turner s priorities are expected to align with his previous initiatives. These include expanding affordable housing options, strengthening public-private partnerships to revitalize urban areas, and addressing systemic challenges such as homelessness and housing insecurity. His nomination comes at a critical time as the nation grapples with escalating housing costs, supply shortages, and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations. Supporters of Turner s nomination laud his hands-on approach and ability to engage with local leaders, community organizations, and private investors to drive meaningful progress. However, critics have raised concerns about the long-term impacts of Opportunity Zones, particularly regarding potential displacement and gentrification in some areas. Turner s ability to address these concerns while fostering equitable development will likely be a focal point during his confirmation hearings. Senate confirmation of Turner is expected, and no significant objections to the appointment have yet been raised.

Treasury Posts Support of HFA Disincentives for Qualified Contracts

In a December 12, 2024 post, the U.S. Department of Treasury expressed strong support for Housing Finance Agency (HFA) attempts to prevent or limit qualified contract requests for LIHTC projects. According to recent Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies data, the United States is facing an unprecedented housing affordability crisis. Record numbers of renters spend over 30% of their income on housing and utilities. As housing costs continue to climb in the wake of the pandemic, preserving existing affordable housing stock has become increasingly critical. The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program is the federal government's primary tool for expanding the affordable housing supply. Between 2000 and 2019, it supported approximately 25% of new apartment construction. However, a provision known as the Qualified Contract option threatens to prematurely remove thousands of units each year from the affordable housing inventory. Understanding the Qualified Contract Challenge The Qualified Contract provision, introduced in 1989, was designed to encourage private investment in affordable housing by offering property owners an early exit option. After 14 years, owners can request their state housing agency find a buyer willing to pay a statutorily defined price. If no qualified buyer emerges within a year, the property can convert to market-rate housing despite the original 30-year affordability commitment. This mechanism has led to significant losses in affordable housing stock. Current estimates indicate that 6,000-10,000 low-income units are lost annually through Qualified Contracts, with cumulative losses reaching approximately 115,000. The problem has intensified recently as the statutory pricing formula often exceeds market value, making it difficult for agencies to secure buyers willing to maintain affordability restrictions. State-Level Solutions State housing agencies have implemented various strategies to address this challenge: Mandatory Waivers Many states now require LIHTC applicants to waive their Qualified Contract rights as a prerequisite for receiving tax credits. North Dakota and Nevada exemplify this approach, making such waivers mandatory for new applications. The Treasury Department strongly endorses these policies and encourages their application across 4% and 9% LIHTC programs. Incentive-Based Approaches Some states have adopted point-based systems to encourage longer affordability commitments. Georgia's program, for instance, awards developers incremental points based on the duration of their Qualified Contract waiver: one point for a 5-year waiver, two points for 10 years, and three points for a complete waiver. Deterrence Measures States have also implemented policies discouraging Qualified Contract requests from existing LIHTC property owners. These measures include: Disqualifying applicants with a history of Qualified Contract requests (Maine, North Carolina) Assigning negative points to applicants who have previously pursued Qualified Contract exits (Indiana, Kansas, New Hampshire) Awarding bonus points to applicants who have never requested a Qualified Contract (South Carolina) Federal Support and Coordination Federal agencies are aligning their policies to reinforce these state-level efforts: HUD has proposed restricting FHA Multifamily and Risk Share insurance access to owners who waive Qualified Contract rights. The Federal Housing Finance Agency now prohibits Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from investing in properties that retain Qualified Contract options. The USDA's Rural Housing Service is developing complementary measures. Looking Forward The Treasury Department strongly supports state and federal initiatives to limit the use of Qualified Contracts and preserve affordable housing. These coordinated efforts are a crucial component of the administration's comprehensive strategy to address the housing affordability and supply challenges facing American families. As housing costs strain household budgets nationwide, preserving existing affordable units through Qualified Contract restrictions becomes increasingly vital. State agencies' innovative approaches to this challenge demonstrate the potential for policy solutions that balance private sector participation with long-term affordability goals. This article reflects the Treasury's position on best practices in LIHTC administration as of December 2024. Please consult your state housing agency for the most current guidance and requirements.

HOTMA Implementation Guide- Key Updates for Multifamily Housing Owners

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has released updated guidance on implementing the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act of 2016 (HOTMA). This comprehensive overview highlights essential deadlines and requirements for Multifamily Housing (MFH) owners, as outlined in the updated HOTMA FAQ. Key Implementation Dates July 1, 2025: Mandatory compliance date for HOTMA provisions. May 31, 2024: Deadline for updating Tenant Selection Plan (TSP) and EIV Policies. Early 2025: Expected release of TRACS 203A system. January 1, 2024: Phased-in medical hardship relief application date. The HOTMA final rule requires the phased-in medical hardship relief to be applied only to families who received the medical deduction based on their most recent income review before January 1, 2024. However, MFH Owners may, at their discretion, utilize the general hardship provision as outlined on pages 43-45 of Notice H 2023-10 to assist affected families, including those who receive a medical deduction but are ineligible for phased-in relief and will otherwise see their deduction drop significantly. HUD reserves the right to permit medical hardship relief waivers on a case-by-case basis. Interim Implementation Options MFH owners can begin implementing HOTMA provisions before the mandatory compliance date. During this transition period: Owners may calculate family incomes and tenant rents manually. The current TRACS 202D system can be used with the rent override function. Both pre-HOTMA and HOTMA-compliant TSPs will be reviewed during Management and Occupancy Reviews (MORs). Management and Occupancy Reviews Contract Administrators will handle HOTMA-related issues during MORs as follows: Before July 1, 2025: HOTMA-related tenant file errors will result in observations rather than penalties. TSP compliance with Notice H 2024-04 was mandatory by May 31, 2024; non-compliance will result in findings. Minor HOTMA-related errors unrelated to Notice H 2024-04 will only receive observations until the TRACS 203A release. Model Leases and Forms New HUD-approved model leases will be released before the mandatory compliance date. When implementing new leases: Families must receive copies 60 days before the lease term ends. A clear explanation letter must be provided. Families have 30 days to accept or refuse modifications. Non-response within 30 days may lead to tenancy termination procedures. Financial Considerations Inflationary Adjustments Properties implementing HOTMA must use adjusted values for the calendar year 2025. Pre-HOTMA amounts remain valid until July 1, 2025, for non-implementing properties. Passbook Savings Rate The rate of 0.06% (effective February 1, 2015) may be used by owners who still need to implement HOTMA. Owners making manual adjustments will not be penalized for using the current imputed rate of 0.40%. HOTMA 2025 rate: 0.45% Medical Hardship Provisions Phased-in medical hardship relief applies only to families with medical deductions reviewed before January 1, 2024. General hardship provisions may be utilized for affected families. HUD may permit case-by-case medical hardship relief waivers. Looking Ahead MFH owners should: Subscribe to the MFH mailing list for updates. Monitor for TRACS 203A release. Prepare for full compliance by July 1, 2025. Review and implement necessary policy updates. Stay informed about new form releases and system changes. This guidance represents a significant transition in multifamily housing administration. Property owners and managers should carefully review all requirements and prepare for full implementation while taking advantage of available flexibility during the transition period.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.