Rural Development Provides Comprehensive Information Regarding HOTMA Implementation

person A.J. Johnson today 09/06/2024

On September 4, 2024, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) Office of Multifamily Housing (MFH) published an Unnumbered Letter (UL) notifying MFH staff of the anticipated timeline for implementing the requirements of the Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act (HOTMA). The HOTMA changes that impact the determination of income affect the RHS Multifamily Housing portfolio.

On March 4, 2024, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) issued a UL notifying multifamily housing staff and stakeholders of RD’s exceptions for HOTMA implementation. The purpose of the September 4 UL is to provide additional guidance and timeframes on implementing changes related to HOTMA. These changes will be in effect for RD projects on January 1, 2025. However, RD will take certain actions before January 1, 2025, as follows.

  • September 2024: RD will provide updated Management Interactive Network Connection (MINC)/Industry Interface specifications for software providers. These new specs will be posted to the MINC home page.
  • October 2024: RD will publish updated Form RD 3560-8 Tenant Certification. The revised form will allow for changes to asset calculations, adjusted income (deductions), and additional options for gender and will include an updated Form Manual Insert (Instructions). The revised form must be used for all tenant certifications with an effective date of January 1, 2025, or later. The current Form 3560-8 will be used for certifications until January 1, 2025.
    • RD will also publish Handbook, HB-2-3560 updates to reflect HOTMA changes in October.
  • January 2025: Multifamily Information Systems (MFS) and MINC systems will be updated to account for the asset and deduction changes correctly.
    • All tenant certifications effective January 1, 2025, and later must implement:
      • New income from asset calculations.
      • The dependent deduction will follow HUD’s annually published deduction. For calendar year 2025, this amount remains $480 per dependent.
      • The elderly deduction will follow HUD’s annually published deduction. For calendar year 2025, this will increase from $400 to $525 per household.
      • For new move-ins, medical expenses exceeding 10 percent of the household’s annual income can be deducted from annual income. Before HOTMA, the threshold was three percent of the family’s annual income.
      • For existing residents completing their annual recertification:
        • Phased-in Relief: Households that qualified for the three percent deduction threshold based on their most recent income certification before January 1, 2025, will begin receiving the 24-month phased-in relief at their next annual recertification, which occurs on or after January 1, 2025.
          • Households who received phased-in relief will have eligible expenses deducted that exceed 5 percent of annual income for 12 months.
          • Twelve months after the five percent phase-in began, households will have eligible expenses deducted that exceed 7.5 percent of annual income for the immediately following 12 months.
          • After the household has completed the 24-month phase-in at the lower thresholds described above, the family will remain at the ten percent threshold unless the family qualifies for relief under the general hardship relief provision.
        • If a family moves from one RD property to another RD property, the phased-in relief may continue. Owners must establish their own policy if they choose to continue the phased-in hardship relief for households who were eligible for relief as of January 1, 2025, and who are treated as new admissions at their property.
      • A current checking account statement will be sufficient to verify a checking account balance. HOTMA eliminated the requirement to use a six-month average balance for checking accounts.
      • The actual amount of child support/alimony received by a household will be included in income. The court ordered amount will no longer be considered.
      • Annual income exclusions have been updated, which include, but are not limited to, changes related to student financial aid, non-recurring income, payments from trusts, and non-cash contributions.
      • HOTMA updates the definition of net family assets, including:
        • Changes to what is excluded when considering net family assets and
        • Differentiates between necessary personal property and non-necessary personal property.
      • HOTMA changes the calculation of income from assets:
        • The threshold for calculating imputed income from assets increases from $5,000 to $50,000.
        • When assets exceed $50,000, imputed income must be calculated but only on assets where no actual income can be computed. If the actual income can be computed for some assets but not all assets, determine the actual income for those asset, then calculate the imputed income for all remaining assets where the actual income cannot be determined, and combine both amounts for total income from assets.
          • HOTMA allows several thresholds to be adjusted annually for inflation. For calendar year 2025, the threshold for calculating imputed income for net family assets is increasing to $51,600, and the imputed rate is rising to 0.45%.

RD will not penalize owners for HOTMA-related tenant file deficiencies during supervisory reviews before January 1, 2025. Examples where owners will not be penalized include:

  • Passbook Savings Rate Change: RD implemented the 0.4% imputed rate on January 1, 2024. HUD and other agencies have allowed owners to delay this change until January 1, 2025. For tenants with assets over $5,000, this has most likely caused a difference in annual income calculations. This will not be cited until January 1, 2025.

The UL also provides clarifying information on some other HOTMA-related issues. Among the most critical clarifications are:

  1. While only some parts of HOTMA will be implemented by RD, all HOTMA required changes regarding income inclusion and exclusion, and the methodology for determining adjusted income will be followed. These include earned income, foster adult, foster child, health and medical care expenses, net family assets, and unearned income.
  2. RD will not implement the following HOTMA provisions:
    1. Streamlined determination of income.
    1. Use of "Safe-Harbor" income verification. This is income verification from other federal means-tested programs to verify gross annual income.
    1. HUD’s de minimis error provisions. Any error in income determination on an RD property must be corrected.
    1. RD will not implement the $100,000 asset limitation for tenant or rental assistance eligibility.
    1. RD will not implement the HUD interim reexamination regulations. RD projects still require that tenant households be recertified whenever a change in household income of $100 or more per month occurs. Recertifications must also be performed for changes of $50 per month if a tenant requests.
    1. RD will not accept self-certification of assets by households. All assets must be verified.

RD has adopted the HUD HOTMA rule regarding the definition of necessary and non-necessary personal property. As with HUD, if the total value of all non-necessary personal property does not exceed $50,000, such property will be excluded from net family assets.

RD is permitting the Childcare Hardship Exemption. A household whose eligibility for the childcare expense deduction is ending may request/receive a hardship exemption to continue receiving a childcare expense deduction in certain circumstances when the household no longer has a member working, looking for work, or seeking to further their education. The deduction is necessary because the household is unable to pay their rent. The hardship exemption and the resulting alternative adjusted income calculation must remain in place for up to 90 days.

Unborn children are not eligible for the dependent deduction. While HUD permits unborn children to be counted for income eligibility purposes, RD does not. However, unborn children may be counted to determine the appropriate unit size.

RD is not implementing the HUD Hierarchy of Verification of Income but does plan to provide guidance in the Handbook on acceptable forms of verification. There are some forms of tenant-provided information that may be acceptable and preferred over third-party verification forms, such as Social Security award letters, pay stubs, bank statements, etc.

RD does not require an update to Tenant Selection Plans, but such plans should be updated if the current policy contains verbiage contradictory to any HOTMA updates.

All owners and Managers of RD properties should review the UL and be prepared to implement all the RD-mandated changes on January 1, 2025.

Latest Articles

HUD Publishes 2025 Income Limits

On April 1, 2025, HUD published the 2025 income limits for HUD programs and the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit and Tax-Exempt Bond programs. The limits are effective on April 1, 2025. The limits for the LIHTC and Bond projects are published separately from those for HUD programs. For better understanding, LIHTC and Bond properties operate under the Multifamily Tax Subsidy Project (MTSP) limits. These properties are 'held harmless' from income limit (and therefore rent) reductions. This means that these properties may use the highest income limits for resident qualification and rent calculation since the project has been in service. However, it's important to note that HUD program income limits are not 'held harmless '. HUD publishes the 50% and 60% MTSP limits alongside the Average Income (AI) limits, which are set at 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80%. Projects that began service before 2009 may utilize the HERA Special Income Limits in areas where HUD has published such limits. Projects placed in service after 2008 cannot use the HERA Special Limits. Projects in rural areas not financed by tax-exempt bonds can use the higher MTSP limits or the National Non-Metropolitan Income Limits (NNMIL). It is important to note that for 2025, HUD has made changes to the definitions of geographic areas as determined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The counties or towns within certain metropolitan areas may have changed. Owners and managers should consult the HUD Area Definition Report for a list of their areas and their components. The link to the Area Definition Report can be found on the website provided below. Owners of LIHTC projects may rely on the 2024 income limits for all purposes for 45 days after the effective date of the newly issued limits, which ends on May 16, 2025. The limits for HUD programs may be found at www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html. The limits for LIHTC and Bond programs may be found at www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/mtsp.html.

Effects of Potential Staffing Cuts on HUD Programs

As the Trump administration moves forward with plans to reduce the federal workforce dramatically, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), according to recent reporting by the Associated Press, could face potential cuts that could eliminate half of its staff approximately 4,000 positions. Widespread Impact Across Essential Services The proposed reductions would affect numerous critical HUD programs, including disaster recovery efforts, rental assistance, housing discrimination investigations, and support for first-time homebuyers. Housing advocates and former HUD officials have raised substantial concerns that these extensive staffing cuts could greatly hinder or even stop the department s ability to carry out its mission. The official HUD position is that this information "should not be considered final. However, the potential extent of these reductions aligns with the administration s broader goal of reducing government spending. Recently appointed HUD Secretary Scott Turner announced the formation of a Department of Government Efficiency task force inspired by billionaire Elon Musk, while also underscoring the identification of "$1.9 billion in misplaced funds and "$260 million in wasteful contracts. Rental Assistance Programs at Risk The proposed cuts most concerning aspect is their potential impact on the Office of Public and Indian Housing, which could lose half its workforce from 1,529 employees to just 765. This office manages rental assistance subsidies for more than 3.5 million households and supports public housing for approximately 1 million people. Georgi Banna, general counsel for the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, warns that such reductions could delay payments for the Section 8 voucher program, which provides rental assistance to millions of low-income Americans. Although tenants have certain protections as long as they pay their share of the rent, they could ultimately face displacement if landlords withdraw from the voucher program due to payment issues. Budget Challenges Compound the Problem The potential staffing cuts come at a particularly challenging time as Congress continues to navigate a contentious appropriations process for HUD programs. The House version of the spending bill would boost funding for Housing Choice Vouchers by $115 million, which sounds promising but falls far short of the estimated $4.3 billion increase needed to simply maintain current service levels, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). If the House budget is approved, it will only meet 90% of the need, potentially causing about 283,000 households to lose voucher access what the CBPP has described as the "most severe funding shortfall in the history of the voucher program. The situation has already caused damage, with some voucher-administering agencies halting the distribution of new vouchers. Local housing authorities have been operating on constrained budgets, and many lack robust reserves to weather a potential government shutdown or significant funding cuts. Fair Housing Enforcement Under Threat Perhaps the most alarming aspect is the proposed 77% reduction in the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, which could shrink its staff from 572 employees to only 134. As HUD s main enforcer of national fair housing laws, this office investigates discrimination complaints and works to ensure equal access to housing. Although Secretary Turner has previously committed to upholding the Fair Housing Act, which includes a statutory mandate for HUD to combat discrimination, the administration s approach to implementing the law may undergo significant changes. Turner recently announced on social media that HUD had canceled $4 million in diversity, equity, and inclusion contracts. Uncertainty for Housing Authorities and Vulnerable Populations Potential staffing cuts and budget uncertainties have come together to create a tumultuous situation for local housing authorities. Housing authorities are finding it difficult to provide clear guidance to both families and landlords while anticipating potentially "draconian consequences if significant cuts or a government shutdown happen. The months ahead may pose unprecedented challenges and uncertainty for millions of Americans relying on HUD programs for stable housing, especially those using Section 8 vouchers. As Congress decides whether to pass a bill keeping the government open, the future of these critical housing programs and the millions of Americans who rely on them hangs in the balance. In conclusion, the proposed staffing cuts at HUD pose a significant threat to the stability and effectiveness of critical housing programs that serve millions of Americans. If carried out, these reductions could disrupt essential services like rental assistance, fair housing enforcement, and disaster recovery putting vulnerable populations at greater risk of housing instability and discrimination. The potential for delayed payments, reduced voucher access, and weakened fair housing protections highlights the profound human impact of these cuts. As Congress deliberates over HUD s budget, the stakes could not be higher for the families, landlords, and housing authorities that rely on these programs for their survival and stability. The coming months will challenge the resilience of HUD s mission and the nation s commitment to providing safe, fair, and affordable housing for all. All those in the affordable housing industry must reach out to their elected representatives to stress the importance of HUD and its programs to the housing needs of America s most vulnerable populations.

A. J. Johnson Partners with Mid-Atlantic AHMA for December Training on Affordable Housing—April 2025

In April 2025, A. J. Johnson will partner with the MidAtlantic Affordable Housing Management Association for four live webinar training sessions for real estate professionals, particularly those in the affordable multifamily housing field. The following sessions will be presented: April 15: Pets/Pot/Service Animals: Navigating Fair Housing A Comprehensive 90-Minute Webinar for Housing Professionals Join us for an essential training session that tackles three of the most challenging areas in fair housing compliance today. This practical webinar will equip affordable housing providers with clear guidance on: Service and Emotional Support Animals: Learn the crucial legal distinctions between pets and assistance animals, proper verification procedures, and how to handle accommodation requests while complying with FHA regulations. Pet Policy Development: Explore effective strategies for creating and enforcing fair pet policies that address resident needs while considering property management concerns. Medical Marijuana Considerations: Explore the intricate relationship between federal and state laws concerning medical marijuana use in housing, including the requirements for reasonable accommodation. Through case studies, interactive discussions, and expert analysis of recent court decisions, you will gain actionable strategies for confidently addressing these challenging issues. This tool is perfect for property managers, leasing agents, compliance officers, and housing administrators who want to minimize legal risk while creating inclusive communities. April 16: VAWA with Tips on Communicating with Victims - The Violence Against Women (VAWA) Reauthorization Act of 2013 expanded VAWA protections to many different affordable housing programs, including the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Program. While HUD has provided detailed requirements on VAWA implementation at HUD properties, there has been no uniform guidance for LIHTC owners and managers. A proposal before Congress would legislate that LIHTC Extended Use Agreements contain VAWA requirements. The IRS has not provided guidance, and while many state agencies are requiring VAWA plans, they are not providing information on what the plans should look like. This two-hour training, when combined with the course materials, will review VAWA requirements and recommend best practices for developing VAWA plans at LIHTC and other non-HUD properties. The session will be presented by A. J. Johnson, a recognized expert in the affordable housing field and the author of "A Property Manager s Guide to the Violence Against Women Act. April 24: Preparation for Physical Inspections - Agency inspections of affordable housing properties are required for all affordable housing programs, and failure to meet the required inspection standards can result in significant financial and administrative penalties for property owners. This four-hour training focuses on how owners and managers may prepare for such inspections, with a concentration on HUD NSPIRE inspections and State Housing Finance Agency inspections for the LIHTC program. Specific training areas include (1) a complete discussion of the most serious violations, including health & safety; (2) how vacant units are addressed during inspections; (3) when violations will be reported to the IRS; (4) the 20 most common deficiencies; (5) how to prepare a property for an inspection; (6) strategies for successful inspections; and (7) a review of the most important NSPIRE Standards as they relate to the three inspectable areas [Units/Interior/Exterior]. The training will summarize the HUD Final Rule on NSPIRE with a discussion of (1) the new Self-Inspection Requirement and Reports; (2) Timeline for Deficiency Correction; (3) New Affirmative Requirements; and (4) Tenant Involvement. At the end of the training, attendees will have a blueprint they can use to prepare their properties for agency-required physical inspections, regardless of the program under which they operate. April 29: Understanding and Managing Hoarding in Residential Properties: A Fair Housing Compliance Workshop - In May 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) confirmed that Compulsive Hoarding is a mental disability and a protected class. More than 15 million Americans suffer from the mental health problem of hoarding and potential problems from hoarding include noxious odors, pest infestation, mold growth, increased risk of injury or disease, fire hazards and even structural damage. Hoarding is the one class of disability that requires landlords to offer an accommodation even if an accommodation is not requested! This 1.5-hour live webinar is designed to assist multifamily managers in understanding how to deal with hoarding problems in a way that will prevent liability under fair housing law. The session will define hoarding and provide detailed recommendations on how to deal with a hoarding problem. It will outline examples of accommodations for hoarding, how to engage in the "interactive process with residents who hoard, and the steps necessary to remove uncooperative residents. Finally, a recent court case regarding hoarding will be reviewed as an illustration of the potential difficulties managers face in hoarding situations. This is an evolving area of fair housing law, and this webinar will provide the guidance necessary to approach the problem in a systematic way that will give multifamily operators the best chance at avoiding the legal traps that exist when dealing with this unique disability. These sessions are part of the year-long collaboration between A. J. Johnson and MidAtlantic AHMA and are designed to provide affordable housing professionals with the knowledge to effectively manage the complex requirements of the various agencies overseeing these programs. Persons interested in any (or all) training sessions may register by visiting either www.ajjcs.net or https://www.mid-atlanticahma.org.

Impact of Trump Administration's Regulatory Restructuring on HUD and IRS

The Trump administration's recent executive order on federal regulations, "Ensuring Lawful Governance and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency' Deregulatory Initiative," signals significant changes for federal agencies. The order has particularly notable implications for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The New Regulatory Framework On February 19, 2025, President Trump signed this executive order as part of a broader deregulatory agenda aimed at reducing what the administration views as bureaucratic overreach. The directive mandates that federal agencies conduct a comprehensive 60-day review of their regulatory frameworks to ensure alignment with both legal requirements and administration policies. The order targets explicitly regulations considered: Unconstitutional Based on improper delegations of legislative power Imposing excessive costs without clear public benefits Harmful to national interests Hindering development across various sectors This order is part of a series of regulatory rollbacks, including directives like "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies" and "Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation," which expand upon the administration's previous deregulatory efforts. Specific Impacts on the IRS The IRS faces several significant challenges under this new directive: Continued Hiring Freeze: The executive order maintains an existing hiring freeze at the IRS, which will remain in effect until the Treasury Secretary, in consultation with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director, determines that lifting it serves the national interest. Increased White House Oversight: IRS regulations will once again be subject to White House review through the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), reinstating a policy from Trump's first term that adds another layer of scrutiny to IRS rulemaking. "10-for-1" Deregulation Mandate: The IRS must eliminate ten existing guidance documents for every new rule or guidance it issues, significantly constraining its ability to update tax regulations and provide new guidance. These measures could substantially impact the IRS's capacity to uphold compliance and maintain operational efficiency, potentially affecting tax administration and enforcement nationwide. Implications for HUD For the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the executive order brings equally significant changes: Comprehensive Program Review: The order requires a review of hundreds of HUD programs, potentially leading to significant restructuring or budget cuts. Grant Funding Uncertainty: Although a federal court temporarily blocked a separate memo seeking to freeze federal grants, the administration's intent to reassess HUD funding remains evident. "10-for-1" Rule Application: Like the IRS, HUD must adhere to the requirement of eliminating ten existing regulations for every new one proposed, which could significantly impact housing policy implementation and program management. These changes may affect HUD's ability to administer housing assistance programs, enforce fair housing regulations, and support community development initiatives. Legal and Procedural Challenges The administration's deregulatory push faces potential legal obstacles: Agencies seeking to rescind or modify rules must generally follow a new rulemaking process, including issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, collecting public comments, and finalizing the new rule. Failure to adhere to these procedural requirements could expose regulatory rollbacks to legal challenges under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The APA requires agencies to engage in reasoned decision-making when modifying or rescinding regulations, and courts may overturn agency decisions if this standard is not met. Outlook As the 60-day review period progresses, the IRS and HUD must navigate competing demands: implementing the administration's deregulatory agenda while maintaining their core functions and avoiding legal challenges. The outcome will likely reshape how these agencies operate and could have lasting implications for the United States s tax administration and housing policy. The full impact of these changes will become more evident as agencies determine which regulations to target and how to implement the administration's directives while fulfilling their statutory obligations.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.