Developer Fees - How They are Viewed by the IRS

person A.J. Johnson today 11/29/2015

  Developer fees represent payment for a developer’s services and are (at least partly) includable in eligible basis for a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) project. There are three basic types of developer fees.   Turnkey Project Fee   The taxpayer (usually a partnership) enters into a development agreement with a developer to pay an amount that includes all hard construction costs and the developer’s fee. If the actual costs exceed the budget, the developer fee is decreased. Fixed Amount Developer Fee A fixed amount developer fee occurs when the "hard costs" and the developer fee are separately stated line items in the contract. Unlike a turnkey agreement, the developer fee does not decrease if the hard costs exceed the budgeted amount. Completed Project Developer Fee A completed project developer fee is passed on to the ultimate purchaser of the building as a component of the purchase price. The individual components (land, new construction, acquisition or an existing building, rehab costs, and developers fee) may not be separately stated.   Related Parties In many cases, the developer is the general partner of the partnership owning the project. The developer may also be related to the entity that actually constructed the project or the property management company operating the project (in some cases - both).   Audit Issues & Techniques   There are four basic issues an IRS examiner will focus on when examining a developer fee:
  1. Character of the services to be provided;
  2. Services actually provided;
  3. Reasonableness of the fee amount; and
  4. Method of payment.
  Character of the Services to be Provided   The services to be provided will be identified in the agreement entered into by the taxpayer and the developer. Typically, the developer agrees to provide (or may have previously provided) services relating to the acquisition, construction, and initial operating phases of the development.  
  • Development Costs Includable in Eligible Basis
    • Examples of services typically includable in eligible basis:
      • Negotiation of agreements for architectural, engineering, and consulting services, the construction of the project or improvements includable in eligible basis, and the furnishing of the associated supplies, materials, machinery or equipment.
      • Applying for and maintaining all government permits and approvals required for the construction of the project and securing the certificates of occupancy when completed.
      • Complying with the requirements imposed by insurance providers during construction.
      • Providing oversight, including inspections, during the course of construction and approving eventual payment for the services rendered.
      • Implementing the taxpayer’s decisions relative to the design, development, and construction of the project.
    • Development Costs not Includable in Eligible Basis
      • Development of a low-income project involves services that are not related to the actual construction of the low-income buildings and, therefore, the cost of such services is not includable in eligible basis. Examples include
        • Acquisition of the project site, including locating the site, performing economic and feasibility studies, market studies, and negotiation of the purchase price.
          • Note - a portion of the purchase price may be included in eligible basis if the purchase includes the acquisition of a building that is subsequently rehabilitated for use as low-income housing.
          • A developer may advise the taxpayer regarding available sources of financing, such as federal, state or local subsidy programs, as well as commercial financing. The cost of such services may not be included in eligible basis.
        • Maintaining contracts, books and records sufficient to establish the value of the completed project.
        • Partnership Costs - services associated with the partnership’s organization, syndication of partnership interests, or securing the allocation of tax credits, are not includable in eligible basis.
  • Initial Lease-Up Costs - the taxpayer may contract with the developer to complete the initial leasing of the rental units. Typical costs would be
    • Hiring on-site staff;
    • Advertising; and
    • Maintaining model units.
These costs are not includable in eligible basis.
  • On-going Management Costs - the developer may also contract to provide on-going management of the day-to-day operations after the initial lease-up. These services may include providing qualified on-site managers, physically maintaining the site, resolving tenant issues, and renewing leases and obtaining new residents. Such costs are not part of eligible basis.
  Services Actually Provided   During an audit, the IRS will work to determine whether the developer actually performed the services covered by the fee. Normally, one developer will initiate development and then provide services throughout the development process until the project is completed. However, there are instances where more than one developer is involved. For example, a for-profit developer may work with a qualified nonprofit organization to develop a low-income project qualifying for a credit allocation from the nonprofit set-aside. When there are multiple developers, there are two basic questions:
  1. How were developmental responsibilities divided among the developers; and
  2. Did the developer have the skills and expertise needed to provide the developmental services and complete the project?
  Reasonable Fee   As a best practice, the state agencies have limited the developer fee amount that can be supported by the credit. This limit is typically a percentage of total costs. There is no requirement that the IRS accept the developer fee allowed by the state agency, and the Service may raise issues involving the reasonableness of the fee if the facts and circumstances warrant doing so.   Method of Payment   Developer fee payments made during development, or at the time development is completed, and which are identified in the taxpayer’s books as payments of developers fees are generally not challenged by the IRS. Deferred fees however, will get a much harder look. In these cases, the IRS will consider whether the payment is contingent upon providing services usually associated with the duties of a general partner. They will also consider whether payment of the developer fee is contingent on successfully operating the project, or maintaining the project, in compliance with §42. If these conditions exist, separately or in combination, then the deferred portion of the fee is not includable in eligible basis because the developer is being paid for services unrelated to the development of the low-income building. Intent to Pay Deferred Developer Fee   A major element in any IRS decision as to whether a deferred developer fee may be included in basis is whether or not the taxpayer intends to pay the deferred fee. This is especially important if the parties to the transaction are related (for business purposes). Consideration will be given to whether:
  • The note and/or other documentation bears no interest rate or no repayment is required for extended periods of time, suggesting that the agreement is not an arm’s length transaction;
  • Payment is contingent on events unlikely to occur;
  • Payment is subordinate to payment of other debt, and it is unclear that payment would ever be financially possible;
  • The developer holds a right of first refusal to purchase the property for a price equal to the outstanding debt; or
  • The general partner, who is (or is related to) the developer, is required to make a capital contribution sufficient to pay the deferred fee if the fee is not paid before a specified date.
If the above fact patterns exist, separately or in combination, the deferred developer fee note may not be bona fide debt. So, what does the IRS consider to be "bona fide" debt?   Generally, debt, whether recourse or nonrecourse, is includable in the basis of property. However, the obligation must represent genuine, noncontingent debt. Nonrecourse debt is not includable if the property securing the debt does not reasonably approximate the principal amount of the debt, or if the value of the underlying collateral is so uncertain or elusive that the purported indebtedness must be considered too contingent to be includable in basis.   Recourse liabilities are generally includable in basis because they represent a fixed, unconditional obligation to pay, with interest, a specified sum of money. However, an obligation, whether recourse or nonrecourse, will not be treated as true debt where payment, according to its terms, is too contingent or repayment is otherwise unlikely. A liability is contingent if it is dependent upon the occurrence of a subsequent event, such as the earning of profits.   Genuine Indebtedness   When considering whether transactions characterized as "loans" constitute genuine indebtedness, tax courts have isolated a number of criteria from which to judge the true nature of an arrangement that in "form" appears to be debt. In Fin Hay Realty Co. v. United States (1968), the court outlined 16 nonexclusive factors that bear on whether an instrument should be treated as debt for tax purposes:
  1. The intent of the parties;
  2. The identity between creditors and shareholders;
  3. The extent of participation in management by the holder of the instrument;
  4. The ability of the debtor to obtain funds from outside sources;
  5. Thinness of capital structure in relation to debt;
  6. The risk involved;
  7. The formal elements of the arrangement;
  8. The relative position of the obligees as to other creditors regarding the payment of interest and principal;
  9. The voting power of the holder of the instrument;
  10. The provision of a fixed rate of interest;
  11. Any contingency on the obligation to repay;
  12. The source of the interest payments;
  13. The presence or absence of a fixed maturity date;
  14. A provision for redemption by the corporation;
  15. A provision for redemption at the option of the holder; and
  16. The timing of the advance with reference to when the taxpayer was organized.
The court stated, "Neither any single criterion nor any particular series of criteria can provide an exclusive answer…" The Tax Court also held that the case-enumerated factors are merely aids to determine whether a given transaction represents genuine debt.   The weight given to any factor depends upon all the facts and circumstances. No particular factor is conclusive in making the determination of whether an instrument constitutes debt or equity. There is no fixed or precise standard. Among the common factors considered when making this determination are whether:
  • A note or other evidence of indebtedness exists;
  • Interest is charged;
  • There is a fixed schedule for payments;
  • Any security or collateral is requested;
  • There is any written loan agreement;
  • A demand for repayment has been made;
  • The parties records, if any, reflect the transaction as a loan; and
  • The borrower was solvent at the time of the loan.
  The key issue is not whether certain indicators of a bona fide loan exist or do not exist, but whether the parties actually intended and regarded the transaction to be a loan. An essential element of bona fide debt is whether there exists a good-faith intent on the part of the recipient of the funds to make repayment and a good-faith intent on the part of the person advancing the funds to enforce repayment.   Related Party Transactions   In a typical LIHTC property, both the general partner and the developer are the same entity. When transactions occur between related parties rather than at arm’s length, they are "subject to particular scrutiny because the control element suggests the opportunity to contrive a fictional debt." Geftman v. Commissioner, 1998. When examining related party transactions, the Service should determine tax consequences not from the "form of the transaction," but from its "true substance." Thus, as stated in Geftman, "a transaction must be measured against an objective test of economic reality and characterized as a bona fide loan only if its intrinsic economic nature is that of a genuine indebtedness."   Intrinsic Economic Nature   A deferred developer fee will be structured as a promissory note or other debt instrument. However, courts will rely more on the relationship between the parties than to the form of the transaction. The essential question is whether the instruments "intrinsic economic nature is that of a genuine indebtedness."   The critical test of the economic reality of a purported debt is whether an unrelated outside party would have advanced funds to the borrower under similar circumstances. Creditors usually avoid subjecting funds to the risk of a borrower’s business as much as possible and seek a reliable return on their investment. For example, commercial lenders impose borrowing terms that limit risks and charge interest rates that reasonably compensate for those risks and provide a reasonable return on the investment. An example of terms that would not represent true debt would be:
  1. A note that is due and payable far in the future;
  2. No installment payments due;
  3. Note is subordinate to other debt an payable only after all operating expenses have been paid;
  4. Note is unsecured and nonrecourse; and
  5. The note is interest free.
  A taxpayer’s thin capitalization adds to the evidence that a deferred developer fee is not real debt. Even if the taxpayer is reasonably capitalized, if the terms of the debt are highly favorable (as noted above), the IRS could deem the deferred fee as not being genuine debt.   The Service will also examine the Taxpayer’s ability to repay the advance and the reasonable expectation of repayment. Normally, there are four possible sources of repayment:
  1. Liquidation of business assets;
  2. Profits;
  3. Cash flow; and
  4. Refinancing with another lender.
  In TAM (Technical Advice Memorandum) 200044004, the IRS provided an example of how the totality of circumstances will lead to the determination of whether a deferred fee is true debt. The circumstances were as follows:
  • At completion of construction, the taxpayer did not have the funds to pay the entire developers fee so it issued a note for the balance;
  • The note was payable at maturity, 13 years from completion of the project;
  • The note was unsecured and source-of-payment restrictions were in effect during the term of the note;
  • Payment was subordinate to other debts;
  • The note bore interest which was compounded annually and added to the unpaid principal during the term of the note;
  • The taxpayer was obligated to pay off the note in full at maturity and the general partners were obligated to make additional capital contributions necessary to pay off the note at maturity; and
  • Financial statements indicated that payments had been made on the note.
Despite the negative elements of the arrangement (long-term maturity, unsecured and source of payment restrictions, and subordination), the IRS concluded that the amount of the developer fee note was includable in eligible basis. There was an obligation to pay and interest accrued. The general partners were obligated to contribute a sufficient amount to pay the note in full, and the taxpayer had sufficient equity and assets to repay the note. Critical to the determination in the TAM was the fact that the note bore interest to compensate the lender for the various financial risks posed by the note. In the case of deferred developer fees, the ultimate burden to demonstrate that the developer fee was earned and is includable in eligible basis rests with the taxpayer. If the taxpayer has deferred payment, the taxpayer will also need to demonstrate the deferred fee is bona fide debt.

Latest Articles

Understanding Income Determination Methods in the HOME Program Final Regulation

Understanding Income Determination Methods in the HOME Program The new final HOME regulation maintains specific income targeting requirements that necessitate accurate income determination for participating families. This article outlines the various methods and requirements for determining annual income under the HOME program's final regulation, effective February 5, 2025. Federal and State Subsidized Housing Units For HOME-assisted rental units that receive Federal or State project-based rental subsidies, participating jurisdictions must defer to the existing income determination processes: The public housing agency's determination The owner's determination The rental subsidy provider's determination Tenant-Based Rental Assistance When families receive Federal tenant-based rental assistance (such as housing choice vouchers) and apply for or live in HOME-assisted rental units, participating jurisdictions can (but are not required to) accept the rental assistance provider's income determination. Standard Income Determination Methods Participating jurisdictions must follow specific procedures for calculating annual and adjusted income for all other cases. The process includes several key components: Documentation Requirements For tenants in HOME-assisted housing without HOME tenant-based rental assistance, jurisdictions can use any of these methods: Examining at least two months of source documents (wage statements, interest statements, unemployment compensation statements). This method must be used to determine initial income. This method is also required every sixth year of the affordability period if the affordability period is ten years or more. In intervening years, the following methods may be used: Obtaining a written statement from the family regarding income and family size, with a certification of accuracy Securing a written statement from a government program administrator that verifies the family's annual income and size Jurisdictions must examine at least two months of source documentation for homeowners receiving rehabilitation assistance, homebuyers, and recipients of HOME tenant-based rental assistance. Income Definitions Participating jurisdictions must choose one of two definitions when determining income eligibility: Annual income as defined in 5.609(a) and (b). This is the Section 8 definition of income and will be used by most PJs. Adjusted gross income as defined by IRS Form 1040 series Important note: Jurisdictions must maintain consistency by using only one definition per HOME-assisted program or rental housing project. Income Calculation Considerations Family Composition and Income Projection When calculating family income, jurisdictions must: Project the prevailing rate of income at the time of eligibility determination. Include income from all household members except live-in aides and foster children/adults. Exclude income derived from the HOME-assisted project. Allow families to certify net family assets below the threshold for imputing income ($51,600 in 2025). Timing Requirements Income determinations are valid for six months. If more than six months elapse between the initial determination and the provision of HOME assistance, family income must be reexamined. Note how this timeframe differs from most other programs, which limit the age of income verifications to 120 days. Adjusted Income Calculations Participating jurisdictions must calculate adjusted income in three specific scenarios: For families receiving tenant-based rental assistance For tenants living in Low HOME Rent units subject to particular provisions. For over-income tenants requiring rent recalculation Special Considerations Participating jurisdictions are not required to calculate adjusted income independently for units assisted by federal or state project-based rental subsidy programs. Instead, they should accept the determination made by the public housing agency, owner, or rental subsidy provider under that program's rules. This comprehensive framework ensures consistent and accurate income determination across HOME program participants while providing flexibility to accommodate various housing assistance scenarios. Special Requirements for Small-Scale Rental Housing A small-scale rental project is a rental housing project comprising no more than four units. This includes single and scattered projects, as long as the total number of units does not exceed four. The definition is intended to provide flexibility and reduce administrative burdens for smaller rental housing developments while ensuring compliance with HOME program requirements. For small-scale housing, the final rule provides exceptions to the requirement for annual re-examinations of tenant income. Instead of annual re-examinations, tenant income must be re-examined according to the following schedule: Initial income determination must be conducted using source documents or a written statement from a government administrator. Triennial income re-examinations: Tenant income must be re-examined every three years during the affordability period. Sixth-year re-examination: A complete income re-examination using source documents must be conducted every sixth year of the affordability period. Additional re-examinations for projects with longer affordability periods: Year 9: For projects with a period of affordability greater than 5 years. Year 12: For projects with a period of affordability greater than 10 years. Year 15: For projects with a period of affordability of 20 years. Year 18: For projects with a period of affordability of 20 years. These exceptions aim to reduce the administrative burden on participating jurisdictions and owners while ensuring compliance with HOME program requirements.

Navigating the HOME Final Rule- Key Updates on Property Standards and Inspections

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) recently updated the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) Final Rule, emphasizing enhanced property standards and inspection requirements for participating jurisdictions (PJs). These updates aim to improve safety, accessibility, energy efficiency, and disaster resilience across affordable housing projects. New Construction Projects For new construction projects under the HOME program, the following standards are essential: Accessibility Compliance: Projects must comply with the design and construction requirements of 24 CFR part 8, Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Fair Housing Act. Energy Efficiency: Compliance with energy standards such as ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2019 for high-rise multifamily buildings and the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code for single-family and low-rise multifamily buildings is mandatory. Disaster Mitigation: New constructions must incorporate features that mitigate future disaster risks in alignment with state and local codes. Detailed Documentation: Construction contracts and documents must be sufficiently detailed to facilitate inspections. Broadband Infrastructure: Broadband installation is required for projects with more than four rental units unless it poses significant financial or logistical challenges. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems must comply with HUD standards. Rehabilitation Projects Rehabilitation projects are subject to the following requirements: Code Compliance: All projects must meet applicable state and local codes or, in their absence, HUD s minimum property standards. Disaster Preparedness: Measures to mitigate future disaster impacts are mandatory. Inspection Documentation: As with new construction, detailed contracts and documents must support the inspection process. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems are required, with allowances for battery-powered smoke alarms in specific cases. Green Building Standards: If the project's cost exceeds the maximum per-unit subsidy limit, it must meet green building standards. Acquisition of Existing Housing For existing housing acquisitions, specific standards apply: Recent Construction or Rehabilitation: Properties built or rehabilitated within 12 months before commitment must meet the respective standards. Safe and Sanitary Conditions: Homes intended for homeownership must be decent, safe, and sanitary, with inspections conducted no earlier than 90 days before commitment. Timely Compliance: Properties must meet standards at purchase or within six months of acquisition, which can be extended to 12 months if necessary. Combination Projects Combination projects that include rehabilitation and new construction must apply the respective standards to each component. Ongoing Property Condition Standards and Inspections To maintain compliance throughout the affordability period, ongoing requirements include: Code Adherence: Properties must meet state and local codes and HUD standards. Detection Systems: Carbon monoxide and smoke detection systems remain mandatory. Inspection Frequency:Initial and annual inspections for tenant-based rental assistance units.On-site inspections within 12 months of project completion and every three years thereafter. Increased inspection frequency for properties with health and safety deficiencies. Acceptance of Alternative Inspections: Inspections under other HUD programs or HUD-approved standards may be accepted. Inspection Procedures To ensure consistency and thoroughness, inspection procedures must include: Detailed Checklists: Inspection checklists and process descriptions. Training: Training and certification protocols for inspectors. Sampling Standards:At least four units must be inspected for projects with up to 20 HOME-assisted units.For projects with 21-130 units, 20% must be inspected. For larger projects, inspection sampling aligns with the NSPIRE methodology. Small-Scale Housing: Streamlined requirements for projects with 1-4 units to reduce administrative burdens. Conclusion The updated HOME Final Rule provides a robust framework to enhance the quality, safety, and sustainability of affordable housing projects. By adhering to these comprehensive standards and inspection protocols, participating jurisdictions can ensure that housing remains affordable, resilient, and livable for years to come.

A. J. Johnson Partners with Mid-Atlantic AHMA for December Training on Affordable Housing - February 2025

In February 2025, A. J. Johnson will partner with the MidAtlantic Affordable Housing Management Association for four live webinar training sessions for real estate professionals, particularly those in the affordable multifamily housing field. The following sessions will be presented: February 11: Basic LIHTC Compliance - This training is designed primarily for site and investment asset managers responsible for site-related asset management. It is especially beneficial to those managers who are relatively inexperienced in the tax credit program. It covers all aspects of credit related to on-site management, including the applicant interview process, determining resident eligibility (income and student issues), handling recertification, setting rents - including a full review of utility allowance requirements - lease issues, and the importance of maintaining the property. The training includes problems and questions to ensure students fully comprehend the material. February 13: Dealing with Income and Assets in Affordable Multifamily Housing - Course Overview - This live webinar provides concentrated instruction on the required methodology for calculating and verifying income and determining the value of assets and income generated by those assets. The first section of the course involves a comprehensive discussion of employment income, military pay, pensions/social security, self-employment income, and child support. It concludes with workshop problems designed to test what the student has learned during the discussion phase of the training and serve to reinforce HUD-required techniques for determining income. The second component of the training focuses on a detailed discussion of requirements related to determining asset value and income. It applies to all federal housing programs, including the low-income housing tax credit, tax-exempt bonds, Section 8, Section 515, and HOME. Multiple types of assets are covered in terms of what constitutes an asset and how they must be verified. This section also concludes with problems designed to test the student s understanding of the basic requirements relative to assets. February 18: Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment & Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - Dealing with tenant-on-tenant harassment is an evolving area of fair housing law. Landlords are generally familiar with how their actions can be construed as discriminatory. But how should they react when one resident violates another's fair housing rights? Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sex in the workplace - including sexual harassment. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees. In addition to having a written sexual harassment policy, companies should also have an effective complaint procedure. Many businesses in the United States have no policies regarding sexual harassment, and such harassment occurs in the highest levels of corporate management. However, the risk of not having such a policy far outweighs the effort required to implement one. These risks are more significant now than ever before. Victims of sexual harassment may now recover damages (including punitive damages), and the Supreme Court has made it easier to prove injury. This two-hour training is designed to help property owners and managers understand the current legal state of these two issues and establish policies to limit potential liability. The session will include a discussion of the most relevant court cases relating to tenant-on-tenant harassment and cases that outline employer risk regarding harassment in the workplace. Participants will also be provided with recommended policies to limit potential liability. February 20: Virginia Landlord Tenant Act Issues for Multifamily Housing Managers Join us for an essential three-hour webinar that provides a comprehensive overview of the Virginia Residential Landlord Tenant Act (VRLTA), critical knowledge for every multifamily housing professional. This intensive training will equip property managers with the latest legal requirements and best practices for successful property operations in Virginia. Key topics include: Essential lease provisions and prohibited practices Security deposit requirements and handling Maintenance obligations and responsibilities Proper notice requirements and tenant communications Rights of entry and property access Handling lease violations and evictions Required disclosures and documentation Tenant rights and remedies Managing emergencies and property damage Recent updates to landlord-tenant law Led by A. J. Johnson, this webinar offers practical insights and actionable guidance to help you: Minimize legal risk and avoid costly mistakes Improve operational compliance Protect your property's interests Maintain positive tenant relationships Navigate challenging situations confidently Perfect for property managers, leasing professionals, maintenance supervisors, and other multifamily housing staff. Participants will receive comprehensive materials and be able to ask questions about real-world scenarios. This opportunity will strengthen your understanding of Virginia landlord-tenant law and enhance your property management expertise. These sessions are part of the year-long collaboration between A. J. Johnson and MidAtlantic AHMA and are designed to provide affordable housing professionals with the knowledge needed to effectively manage the complex requirements of the various agencies overseeing these programs. Persons interested in any (or all) training sessions may register by visiting either www.ajjcs.net or https://www.mid-atlanticahma.org.

HUD Strengthens Tenant Protections in New HOME Rule

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published the Final Rule for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program, which will take effect on February 5, 2025. The new rule significantly enhances tenant protections and lease requirements, establishing a robust framework for tenant rights and landlord responsibilities. Enhanced Lease Requirements The Final Rule mandates that property owners provide written leases with a minimum one-year term, though shorter periods are permissible if mutually agreed upon. These leases must incorporate a HOME tenancy addendum and include multiple communication methods for tenant-owner interaction. The participating jurisdiction's contact information must also be clearly stated in the lease agreement. Physical Condition Standards Property owners face stricter property maintenance and repair requirements under the new rule. They must: Maintain units and projects in compliance with property standards and local codes Provide written timeframes for maintenance and repairs Refrain from charging tenants for normal wear and tear Relocate tenants to suitable housing if life-threatening deficiencies cannot be immediately addressed Tenant Rights and Protections The rule significantly expands tenant rights, including: Use and Occupancy Rights Exclusive use and occupancy of their units Reasonable access to common areas Right to organize tenant associations Protection against unreasonable entry, requiring advance notice except in emergencies Legal and Administrative Protections Right to independent legal representation Access to jury trials and appeals Protection against unauthorized seizure of personal property Safeguards against retaliation for exercising tenant rights Confidentiality of personal information Notice Requirements The rule strengthens notification requirements, mandating that owners: Provide written notice before any adverse actions Notify tenants of ownership or management changes Give at least 30 days' notice before property sales or foreclosures Issue written notices specifying grounds for adverse actions Security Deposits and Termination Security Deposit Regulations Deposits cannot exceed two months' rent Must be fully refundable Owners must itemize any charges against the deposit Unused portions must be promptly refunded Termination Procedures Termination is permitted only for serious lease violations, legal infractions, or good cause. Minimum 30-day notice required for termination Exception for immediate threats to safety or property Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity The Final Rule reinforces compliance requirements with all applicable non-discrimination and equal opportunity regulations, ensuring fair treatment of all tenants regardless of protected characteristics. Compliance Timeline Property owners and participating jurisdictions must implement these enhanced protections by February 5, 2025, when the Final Rule takes effect. This timeline ensures adequate preparation for the new requirements while maintaining continuous tenant protections during the transition period.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.