News

A. J. Johnson to Provide Live Webinar on Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

A. J. Johnson will be conducting a webinar on July 11, 2023, on Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. The Webinar will be held from 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM Eastern time. Dealing with tenant-on-tenant harassment is an evolving area of fair housing law. Landlords are generally familiar with how their actions can be construed as discriminatory. But how should landlords react when one resident is violating the fair housing rights of another resident?Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sex in the workplace - including sexual harassment. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees. In addition to having a written sexual harassment policy, companies should also have an effective complaint procedure.Many businesses in the United States have no policies regarding sexual harassment, and such harassment occurs in the highest levels of corporate management. However, the risk of not having such a policy far outweighs the effort required to implement one.These risks are greater now than ever before. Victims of sexual harassment may now recover damages (including punitive damages) and the Supreme Court has made it easier to prove injury.This three-hour training is designed to help property owners and managers understand the current legal state of these two issues and to establish policies to limit potential liability. The session will include a discussion of the three most relevant court cases relating to tenant-on-tenant harassment as well as cases that outline employer risk regarding harassment in the workplace. Participants will also be provided with recommended policies to limit potential liability. Those interested in participating in the Webinar may register on the A. J. Johnson Consulting Services website (www.ajjcs.net) under "Training Schedule."

Public Housing Over-Income Rule Must be Fully Implemented by July 14

On March 13, 2023, HUD s Office of Public and Indian Housing (PIH) issued Notice PIH-2023-03, which provides supplemental guidance on the implementation of HOTMA Section 103. This section of HOTMA applies only to public housing agencies (PHAs) with 250 or more public housing units. Section 103 became effective on March 16, 2023, and PHAs must fully implement over-income policies no later than July 14, 2023. According to the statute, after a household s income has exceeded the over-income (OI) limit for 24 consecutive months, a PHA must either terminate the household s public housing tenancy within six months or allow by PHA policy the OI household to continue to live in a public housing unit by charging the household an alternative rent. The alternative rent must equal the greater of the Fair Market Rent (FMR) or the amount of monthly subsidy provided for the unit as determined by the amount of Operating and Capital Funds apportioned to a unit. Over-Income Limit The over-income limit is established by multiplying the very low-income level for the applicable area by a factor of 2.4, a limit equal to approximately 120% of the area median income (AMI). Falling Below OI Limit If the PHA determines (in an interim or regular reexamination) that a family s income has fallen below the OI limit at any time during the 24-month grace period, the family will remain public housing eligible and return to regular income reexamination periods. If the family becomes OI again, a new 24-month grace period begins. Notices Once a family is determined to be over-income, a PHA must notify the household. Notice PIH-2023-03 requires three written notices, while PIH-2019-11 required only two. Each notice must be given within 30 days of the income examination that determines the family is, or remains, OI - at the initial determination of OI status, following the reexamination at the conclusion of the first 12 months of the grace period, and at the conclusion of the 24-month grace period. Policies PHAs must have a "continued occupancy policy" detailed in its Admissions & Continued Occupancy Policy (ACOP) that either requires OI families to execute a new non-public housing over-income (NPHOI) lease within 60 days of notification and charge the family the alternative non-public housing rent or terminate the tenancy of the family no more than six months after the notification. Bottom Line PHAs that have not fully implemented the HOTMA requirements relating to over-income public housing residents must do so no later than July 14, 2023.

HUD Provides Funding for Green Retrofits

A new HUD program will simultaneously invest in utility efficiency, renewable energy generation, and climate resilience strategies in HUD Multifamily Assisted Housing. The funding for the program is provided by the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and provides HUD with $837.5 million in grant funding and $4 billion in loan authority for the program. The funding will allow owners to invest in technology such as solar panels, heat pumps, wind-resistant roofing, and other technologies that will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. HUD has published three Notices of Funding Opportunity (NOFOs) for the Green and Resilient Retrofit Program (GRRP), along with implementation guidance in Housing Notice H 2023-05. The funding is available for multiple HUD programs, including Section 8 Project-Based, Section 202, and Section 811.  The program has three funding options: Elements Awards: provides funding to owners to add energy efficiency, electrification, and renewable energy measures for in-progress rehabilitation. These awards are intended for sites with renovation planning already in progress. An example would be an owner who is well advanced in planning and financing a rehab and, as a result of the award, the owner can replace the in-unit HVAC system with higher efficiency electric HVAC systems. Approximately $140 million in grants and surplus cash loans are available and the funding is capped at $40,000 per unit or $750,000 per property. Applications are due March 28, 2024. This option has excellent potential for HUD-assisted projects that have been purchased and are being layered with Low-Income Housing Tax Credits. Leading Edge Awards: this provides funding for retrofit activities designed to achieve ambitious outcomes, including net zero emissions, renewable energy generation, low-carbon building materials, and climate-resilient investment. For example, this will allow owners to do a complete renovation and achieve a passive house certification. Approximately $400 million in loans and grants is available with funding capped at $60,000 per unit or $10 million per property. Applications are due April 30, 2024. Comprehensive Awards: This is the widest-ranging option and will include properties that are not yet in the planning process. It will prioritize sites with a significant need for energy efficiency, emissions reductions, and climate resilience. An example of an applicant for this award is a site with high REAC scores and low capital needs but has older, fossil fuel-dependent equipment. Owners utilizing this funding will be assisted by HUD-procured Multifamily Assessment Contractors in developing the scope of work. It is intended to provide whole-building retrofits and resilient design elements. $1.47 billion is available for this option and is capped at $80,000 per unit or $20 million per property. Applications are due May 30, 2024. Owners interested in applying for these funds through the Office of Recapitalization within the Office of Multifamily Programs in the Office of Housing. Owners may apply in one category only for a site, but there is no limit to the number of sites an owner, or its affiliate, can submit across all award categories. The required application materials can be found at Grants.gov under the funding opportunity number cited within HUD s NOFO. The NOFos can be found at www.hud.gov/grrp. Questions may be emailed to GRRP@hud.gov.

Bipartisan Bill with LIHTC Expansion Introduced in Congress

On May 11, 2023, the Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act (AHCIA) was introduced in both the House and Senate by bipartisan groups of legislators. If passed, the legislation would finance an additional 1.94 million affordable rental units over a ten-year period. Key Elements of the Bills Increase the Amount of Credit: The bills would expand the 9% LIHTC by restoring the 12.5% cap increase that expired in 2021 and would increase allocations by an additional 50% over a two-year period. Make the Average Income Test Available to Tax-Exempt Bond Projects: This would align the tax-exempt bond and LIHTC programs and permit all three set-asides (20/50/40/60{25/60 in New York City}/Average Income). Simplify the Student Rule: The bills align the LIHTC and HUD student rules by essentially adopting the HUD rule for both programs. It would still ensure that households occupied entirely by full-time students under the age of 24 would be ineligible, with certain exceptions. These exceptions would be (1) single parents; (2) formerly homeless youth; (3) persons aging out of foster care; (4) victims of domestic violence and human trafficking; and (5) veterans. Limit the Rent for Housing Choice Vouchers to No More than the LIHTC Rent: Under current law, owners may collect the full value of a Housing Choice Voucher - even if it exceeds the LIHTC maximum rent level. The bills would limit the rent charged to the maximum permitted LIHTC rent for properties using the Average Income Set-Aside or benefitting from the basis boost for extremely low-income households (contained elsewhere in the bills). Increase the Credit Amount for Projects Serving Extremely Low-Income Households: The bills provide up to a 50% basis boost for sites serving extremely low-income households in at least 20% of the units. The boost would apply only to the percentage of the property reserved for extremely low-income households. Clarify VAWA Protections for LIHTC Properties: The bills require all LIHTC Extended Use Agreements to include VAWA protections, clarify that owners should treat victims with a bifurcated lease as an existing resident and not require requalification, and exempt domestic violence victims from the general public use provisions of Section 42. Prohibit Local Approval and Contribution Requirements: The bills remove the provision of the current law that requires state agencies to notify the chief executive officer of the local jurisdiction of the proposed project and specify that the selection criteria in the Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) cannot include consideration of any support for or opposition to a development from local or elected officials or local government contributions to a development. Increase of Population Cap for Difficult Development Areas (DDAs): Currently, sites are eligible for up to a 30 percent basis boost if they are located in a DDA, meaning areas with high construction, land, and utility costs relative to area median gross income. No more than 20 percent of the aggregate population of the entire country may be located in census tracts that are eligible to receive the DDA designation. The bill would increase the DDA population cap from 20 to 30 percent, and, therefore, enable sites in more high-cost areas to receive additional LIHTC equity if necessary to make the property financially feasible. Basis Boost for Indian & Rural Areas: Most Tribal and rural areas do not currently qualify for the 30% boost. The bills would modify the definition of a DDA to automatically include properties in these areas. Bottom Line - While it is unlikely that the AHCIA will pass as a stand-alone piece of legislation, it is hoped that many of the provisions will be included in other major housing-related bills. None of the provisions are controversial, and there is broad support for all of them. As we approach the end of 2023, there is at least a decent chance that some of the provisions will become law.

HUD Issues Final NSPIRE Standards

The Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced the pending federal register publication of the Final Inspection Standards Notice for the National Standards for the Physical Inspection of Real Estate (NSPIRE). The notice details inspectable items at HUD-assisted and Multi-family insured properties. This includes a classification of the conditions that are considered life-threatening, severe, moderate, or low-risk by item and inspectable area. Additionally, the notice commits HUD to review standards at least every three years. NSPIRE improves HUD s oversight by aligning and consolidating inspection regulations used to evaluate HUD housing across multiple programs. NSPIRE strengthens HUD s physical condition standards, formerly known as the Uniform Physical Condition Standards (UPCS) and the Housing Quality Standards (HQS). Effective October 1, 2023, UPCS and HQS will no longer exist. The NSPIRE standards were tested during the NSPIRE Demonstration and were opened for public comment on June 17, 2022. The final standards were published with changes considering feedback HUD received and additional field testing during the NSPIRE Demonstration. Major changes include: Addressing life-threatening and severe deficiencies within 24 hours. All other deficiencies must be addressed within 60 days or a reasonable period. Making the Smoke Alarm Standard consistent with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard 72. Creating a Fire Door Standard detailing the specific function, operability, and structural integrity requirements for fire doors. Requiring carbon monoxide alarms to be installed in compliance with the 2018 International Fire Code. Setting minimum temperature requirements during the colder months and requiring a permanent heating source. Including criteria for when guardrails and handrails are required. Establishing infestation deficiencies based on discrete levels of observations with clarification on citable pests. Developing deficiencies based on observed mold conditions or elevated moisture levels measured using a moisture meter. Including a deficiency for an enhanced visual assessment for deteriorated paint in units where children under six years of age reside to document potential lead-based paint hazards. Specifying Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI) protection as a requirement. Including affirmative habitability requirements for bathrooms, kitchens, and other rooms used by residents. HUD published the final NSPIRE rule on May 11, 2023, that made changes to inspections for Public Housing and Multifamily Housing programs. In addition to the final rule, the Final Standards Notice is one of three core subordinate publications as part of NSPIRE; HUD will publish the two remaining notices - the final Scoring and Administrative Notices - this summer. How NSPIRE Differs The new NSPIRE scoring approach is very different from the ones used by REAC since 1999. As noted earlier, NSPIRE will formally align expectations of housing quality and consolidate inspection standards. Currently, UPCS inspections are "risk-based" inspections. A risk-based inspection takes a sampling of results and determines what risk may be present on the entire property and the owner s general operation. HQS inspections are results-based, and these standards are used to create a list of items that need to be corrected in order to participate in a HUD program (e.g., housing choice vouchers). The updated NSPIRE inspection protocols seek to combine the aims of both approaches. It uses a "risk-based" approach of using results to encourage better day-to-day compliance and a "results-based" approach that aims to ensure the issues are corrected in a prompt manner. Also, NSPIRE inspection standards and scoring methodology reflect NSPIRE s goals of focusing on the health and safety of residents over curb appeal and on life-threatening and severe deficiencies inside units resulting in more scoring impact than those outside the units. Three Components of NSPIRE NSPIRE is designed around three components that are intended to help accomplish HUD goals with the updated inspection program. The NSPIRE model provides for three inspection types, which include a self-inspection element to support owners and managers adopting year-round maintenance practices: Self-Inspection: Under NSPIRE, every year each owner/manager will inspect all units and retain a record of those inspections for three years. In a change from the proposed rule, electronic transmission of inspection results to HUD will not be required. NSPIRE Inspections: These inspections will be conducted by contract inspectors and public housing agencies every one to five years, depending on a property s previous inspection score. NSPIRE Plus: HUD federal inspectors may conduct additional inspections triggered by poor property conditions. Inspectable Areas Under UPCS, there are five inspectable areas. With NSPIRE, HUD establishes and consolidates the inspectable areas of a REAC inspection into three easily identifiable locations: Unit, Inside, and Outside. Unit: A "unit" of housing refers to the interior components of an individual apartment - where the resident lives. Inside: Inside means the common areas and building systems that can be generally found within the building interior but are not inside a unit. Outside: "Outside" refers to the building site, building exterior components, and any building systems located outside the building or unit. Deficiency Categories NSPIRE has abandoned the UPCS levels of deficiency (1-3, from least to most severe) in favor of a model that just identifies whether there is a specific deficiency or not. The severity is indicated by the overall category of deficiency. The majority of deficiencies are now considered health & safety deficiencies. Health & Safety deficiencies have strict deadlines to correct and report as corrected to HUD. For severe health & safety deficiencies, an owner will have 24 hours to correct and 72 hours to report to HUD. For standard health and safety deficiencies, an owner will have 30 days to correct and 35 days to report the correction to HUD. Health & Safety: This category makes up most of the NSPIRE deficiencies because they are believed to be focused on the most critical elements that impact resident safety and habitability. There are two main categories of health and safety deficiencies: standard and severe. And the severe category is broken down into life-threatening and non-life-threatening. Function & Operability: These deficiencies are those where the resident is unable to use certain fixtures, features, or appliances. An example would be a sink that is constantly running. Deficiencies of this type require repair based on the property s routine maintenance plan. Condition & Appearance: These deficiencies are those where components of the property don t meet reasonable expectations of condition and appearance or are damaged. In these cases, the repair would be based on the property s routine maintenance plan. Proposed NSPIRE Scoring Format The NSPIRE scoring methodology converts observed defects into a numerical score and is easier to understand than under UPCS. HUD intends to continue using the zero to 100-point scale for purposes including (but not limited to): Frequency of Inspections - properties that score higher will receive fewer inspections; Enforcement - low-scoring properties will be subject to HUD enforcement actions; Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS) Designations - average weighted inspection scores comprise 40 points of a PHAS designation; Participant Evaluation - inspection scores will be considered when determining future involvement of owners and agents in HUD projects; and Risk Assessment - HUD will use the scores to assess risk for individual properties. Scoring Calculations With the proposed scoring format, standards that are categorized as more severe will have a greater impact on a property s score when the deficiencies are in a unit, and a property with observed health and safety defects in the units is more likely to fail an inspection than a comparable property with less severe defects. As noted above, NSPIRE has three inspectable areas - Units/Inside/Outside. Within these three inspectable areas, there are four Defect Severity Categories: (1) Life-Threatening {most severe}; (2) Severe; (3) Moderate; and (4) Low {least severe}. To determine a site s score, for each of the categories, the number of deficiencies on an inspection will be multiplied by a HUD-provided multiplier and that value will be divided by the unit sample. The following example illustrates how the scoring will work: Assume ten units are sampled. The inspection finds four life-threatening issues in the units, and three moderate defects Inside. A life-threatening finding in a unit is worth 60 points so the unit section would be 60 X 4 or 240. Divided by the unit sample of ten, the total is 24. A moderate defect found "Inside" is worth 5 points so the Inside section would be 3 X 5 or 15. Divided by the unit sample of ten, the total is 1.5. These numbers are deducted from 100 resulting in a score of 74.5 or 75 after being rounded to the nearest whole number. It is important to note that while calculated scores are rounded to the nearest whole number in most cases, sites that score between 59 and 60 will always be rounded down to 59. Fail Scores There are two situations in which a site will be considered to have failed inspection. Failure to achieve a score at or above 60 is considered a failing score, and sites with a unit point deduction of 30 or more will fail - even if there are no other deductions for the Inside or Outside parts of the review. Letter Grades In order to improve the ease of understanding the meaning of the scores, HUD will assign a letter grade to each property inspection score. Bottom Line HUD s expected actions for scores of 30 or less, or two successive scores under 60 will be specifically outlined in future HUD guidance. Severe consequences should be anticipated for any property falling into either of these categories. These standards represent a transformative step in improving the quality, safety, and livability of affordable housing in the United States. By expanding inspection criteria to include health and safety, promoting livability and accessibility, and implementing a standardized scoring system, NSPIRE is raising the bar for affordable housing providers. Owners and agents need to get ahead of the curve by ensuring that their properties are maintained on a regular basis - with particular emphasis on the condition of the units.

Live-in Aide Has No Survivorship Right for Apartment

In Senior Citizens Housing Development Corporation of Stonington v. Heath, April 2023, a court ruled that if a Live-in Aide is not a party to a lease, the person has no right to remain in the unit after the death of the resident. In this case, the property owner sought the removal of a tenant s daughter from a unit, arguing that the daughter had no legal right to remain in the unit. The property is financed through the HUD Section 202 program. The former tenant (the Mother) had lived in the apartment from 2006 until her death in 2022. The tenant s daughter began living in the unit in 2008 but refused to vacate after her mother s death. The owner went to court seeking the removal of the daughter, and the daughter asked the Connecticut state court to dismiss the case. Adult children are not eligible to live in Section 202 sites unless they are categorized as a live-in aide for a disabled person. In this case, the daughter was never given the status of a tenant. The daughter was not formally approved as a live-in aide until 2017 when the mother submitted an application for a live-in aide. A doctor certified that the tenant was disabled under federal law and that the daughter would be living in the unit "for the sole purpose of providing supportive services essential to the member s care and well-being." In May 2021, the daughter signed a Live-in Aide Agreement that stated, "I also understand that should the tenant vacate the apartment, I have no legal right to occupy and must also vacate." On October 27, 2022, the tenant died, and as of that date, the daughter was no longer providing the services of a live-in aide. The court denied the daughter s request to dismiss the owner s removal case. The court found that the daughter was not a party to the lease signed by her mother and the property manager. Also, the daughter was in an arrangement to provide services for a tenant, with a full understanding that upon the death of the tenant, her need to be a "live-in aide" would end. Therefore, after her mother s death, the daughter had no legal authority to remain in the apartment. The judge also cited the HUD Handbook 4350.3, par 3-6(E)(3)(a)(2)(c), which emphasizes a live-in aide's conditional qualification for occupancy. Bottom Line: This again emphasizes the importance of not showing a live-in aide anywhere on a lease. The lease is the document that provides occupancy rights, and if a live-in aide appears on a lease - even as an occupant - it could jeopardize an owner s attempts to remove an aide after the death or move-out of a resident.

A. J. Johnson to Offer Webinar on Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace

A. J. Johnson will be conducting a webinar on July 11, 2023, on Tenant-on-Tenant Harassment and Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. The Webinar will be held from 1:00 PM to 4:00 PM Eastern time. Dealing with tenant-on-tenant harassment is an evolving area of fair housing law. Landlords are generally familiar with how their actions can be construed as discriminatory. But how should landlords react when one resident is violating the fair housing rights of another resident?Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on sex in the workplace - including sexual harassment. The law applies to employers with 15 or more employees. In addition to having a written sexual harassment policy, companies should also have an effective complaint procedure.Many businesses in the United States have no policies regarding sexual harassment, and such harassment occurs in the highest levels of corporate management. However, the risk of not having such a policy far outweighs the effort required to implement one.These risks are greater now than ever before. Victims of sexual harassment may now recover damages (including punitive damages) and the Supreme Court has made it easier to prove injury.This three-hour training is designed to help property owners and managers understand the current legal state of these two issues and to establish policies to limit potential liability. The session will include a discussion of the three most relevant court cases relating to tenant-on-tenant harassment as well as cases that outline employer risk regarding harassment in the workplace. Participants will also be provided with recommended policies to limit potential liability. Those interested in participating in the Webinar may register on the A. J. Johnson Consulting Services website (www.ajjcs.net) under "Training Schedule."

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.