News

Court Decision- A Compromised Immune System is Not a Disability

In the case of Eastwood v. Willow Bend Lake Homeowners Association, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108389, June 2020), a court denied a Texas resident s request for an emergency order to allow him to fence off his yard because of his disability - a compromised immune system - which he stated left him vulnerable to COVID-19 exposure from passing strangers. The resident owned a single family home in a community governed by a homeowners association (HOA). Under the community rules, any construction to community properties, such as installation of a fence, must be preapproved by the HOA. The resident s property backed up to the shore of a lake. His backyard was divided by a jogging path. With the HOA s approval, the resident fenced off the front half of his backyard, next to his house. At that time, the jogging path and unfenced area of his yard by the lake were used only by other community residents. In recent years, however, he said that the general public began using the path and the unfenced portion of his yard to sit, nap, picnic, fish, feed birds, exercise, and relieve their dogs. In 2019, the resident asked the HOA for permission to install a new three-sided fence around the back portion of his yard between the path and the lake. The HOA denied the request, and the resident sued the HOA; the case was still pending in state court. In the meantime, the resident was diagnosed with cancer and began chemotherapy treatments, causing his immune system to become compromised. According to the resident, his doctor told him that direct sunlight was therapeutic to his physical and psychological recovery from the cancer, but only the unfenced portion of his yard next to the lake got direct sunlight. In April 2020, the resident asked the HOA for a reasonable accommodation to allow him to install the second fence due to his disability of having an impaired immune system. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the resident said his doctor now believed that it was too risky for him, due to his compromised immune system and his susceptibility to the virus, to be around people who were not part of his household. For this reason, the resident said that he and the doctor agreed that it was not safe for him to use the unfenced portion of his yard. The HOA denied his request. The resident sued under the Fair Housing Act, claiming that the HOA violated fair housing law by denying his reasonable accommodation request. He requested an emergency court order allowing him to install the fence. The court denied his request, indicating that the resident failed to demonstrate that he had a disability. Based on this, the court ruled that the resident was unlikely to prevail at trial so he was not entitled to an emergency order. Under fair housing law, an individual has a disability if he has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. The resident claimed that he suffered from a physical impairment due to his compromised immune system, which limited his major life activity of being "in close proximity to persons unknown to him." But the resident could not show any cases - and the court found none - supporting his claim that being close to strangers was a major life activity. Instead, the court ruled that this activity was outside the range of major life activities - those central to daily life such as walking, seeing, and breathing. This case demonstrates that in order to be eligible for a reasonable accommodation under fair housing law, a person must be able to demonstrate that they have a disability that "substantially" limits major life activities. While the ability to socialize is considered a major life activity, in this case, the court appears to have felt that this does not include the ability to be around strangers.

HUD Announces Resumption of REAC Inspections

On August 7, 2020, the Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) has announced that REAC inspections will resume, under a protocol that will prioritize the inspection of properties in counties identified has being at low-risk for COVID-19. Based on the HUD announcement, REAC inspections will start up on or after September 21, 2020, and will be prioritized to properties with historically low REAC scores in localities at low-risk of COVID-19. HUD s announcement states that risk determinations will be based on the latest COVID-19 data from Johns Hopkins University and health risk scoring methodology from the Harvard Global Health Institute. REAC is categorizing states and localities into four risk categories based on this data. HUD says it will maintain a comprehensive list of safe inspection locations on the HUD website. The website has a map identifying states in four risk categories and an excel spreadsheet identifying the risk level of counties as of July 26, 2020 and August 1, 2020. From lowest to highest COVID-19 risk, the risk categories are: (1) low risk; (2) moderately low risk; (3) moderately high risk; and (4) high risk. HUD says REAC will provide a listing on its website of low-risk counties 45 prior to the start of physical inspections. Per HUD, the priority locations will change over time, and HUD will adjust its inspection plans as needed. It is expected that the Excel spreadsheet will be update on a regular basis. HUD also stated that at the end of the 45-day period, REAC will provide a 14-day notification to priority properties in appropriate counties to inform families that an inspection will take place. The first outreach from inspectors to properties will start no earlier than September 21, 2020. Inspectors will prioritize  properties with historically low REAC scores (high risk properties) in Low Risk localities. Based on the current risk assessment, the states most likely to have inspections in the short term are: Vermont (the only low risk state);Maine;New Hampshire;Massachusetts;Rhode Island;Connecticut;New Jersey;Delaware;West Virginia;Michigan;South Dakota;Wyoming;Colorado; andOregon Due to the high incidences of COVID-19, it is unlikely that most southeastern states will undergo REAC inspections in the near-term, although many moderate risk states have some low-risk counties that may be subject to inspection. The Return to Operations Map may be accessed at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/reac

A. J. Johnson Offering Webinar on Handling Assets on Affordable Housing Properties

A. J. Johnson will be conducting a webinar on August 18, 2020 on Dealing with Resident Assets at Affordable Housing Properties. The Webinar will be held from 1:00 PM to 3 PM Eastern Time. This two hour course provides a detailed discussion of requirements related to the determination of asset value and income, and is applicable to all federal housing programs, including the low-income housing tax credit, tax-exempt bonds, Section 8, Section 515, HOME, and Public Housing. Multiple types of assets are covered, both in terms of what constitutes an asset and how they must be verified. The course concludes with a series of problems, designed to test the ability of the attendee to determine the value of an asset and calculate the income from that asset. Those interested in participating in the Webinar may register on the A. J. Johnson Consulting Services website (www.ajjcs.net) under "Training."

Multifamily Property Owners in Forbearance Required to Inform Tenants of Protections

On August 6, 2020, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that multifamily property owners with mortgages backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) who enter into a new or modified forbearance agreement must inform tenants in writing about tenant protections during the project s forbearance and repayment periods. Landlords with Enterprise-backed mortgages can enter into new, or if qualified, modified forbearance if they experienced or continue to experience a financial hardship due to the COVID-19 emergency. While in forbearance, the property owners must agree not to evict tenants solely for the nonpayment of rent. FHFA previously announced additional tenant protections that apply during the repayment periods. These protections include: Giving tenants at least a 30-day notice to vacate;Not charging tenants late fees or penalties for nonpayment of rent; andAllowing tenants flexibility to repay back rent over time and not in a lump sum. Specifically, landlords must notify tenants that they cannot be evicted for nonpayment of rent due to the pandemic. However, if tenants are able to pay their rent, they should continue to do so. In addition to the tenant notification, the Enterprises are also improving their online multifamily property loan look-up tools by putting the tenant protections on the tools landing page and by making it easier for tenants to find out if the property in which they reside has an Enterprise backed mortgage. FHFA will continue to monitor the coronavirus impact on tenants, borrowers, and the mortgage market and update policies as needed. To better understand the protections and assistance the government is offering, owners and managers should visit the joint HUD, FHFA, and CFPB website at cfpb.gov/housing.

Despite Recent HUD Guidance, States Must Still Update Qualified Allocation Plans to Reflect IRS Monitoring Regulation

In February 2019, the IRS published a final regulation on how State Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs) must monitor for compliance with the requirements of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC). On July 1, 2020, the Service released a proposed regulation, changing one of the requirements of the 2019 guidance. The proposed regulation relaxes the minimum compliance monitoring sampling requirement for purposes of physical inspections and file reviews but did not modify any of the other requirements of the February 26, 2019 regulation. Provisions of the regulation that have not been modified are: 1. The "all-buildings" rule is retained in the final regulation except for properties that undergo REAC inspections. The IRS is concerned that HFAs may not all have inspectors as well-trained as the HUD-approved REAC inspectors and is therefore requiring a physical inspection of all buildings when the property is not undergoing a REAC inspection. 2. The "reasonable notice" timeframe: The final regulations shorten the reasonable notice requirement to a 15-day notice that a project will experience an upcoming physical inspection or file review.  Also, as noted in the regulation, under the REAC protocol, HUD or HUD-certified REAC inspectors randomly select low-income units for inspection on the day of the inspection; HFAs are now required to do the same. 3. Treatment of scattered site or multiple buildings with a common owner and plan of financing. While a number of industry practioners recommended that in the case of scattered site or multiple buildings with common ownership and financing, the HFA be able to treat the project as a single project for compliance monitoring purposes - regardless of whether or not the owner made the multiple building election on the IRS Form 8609, the final regulation does not adopt this regulation. For compliance monitoring purposes, a project will be defined in accordance with Section 42 - an HFA cannot deem separate buildings to be a project if the 8609 multiple building project election has not been made. 4. All HFAs are required to amend their Qualified Allocation Plans (QAP) to include the requirements of this final regulation. On the date the QAP is amended, Revenue Procedure 2016-15 will be considered obsolete. QAPs must be amended no later than December 31, 2020. 5. Random Selection Requirements: Agencies generally may not select the same low-income units of a low-income housing project for on-site inspections and file reviews, because doing so would usually give prohibited advance notice.  The HFA must select the units for inspections or low-income certification review separately and in a random manner. 6. Meaning of Reasonable Notice: the 15-day notice period begins on the date the Agency informs the owner that an on-site inspection of a project and low-income unit file review will occur. Notice of more than 15-days, however, may be reasonable in extraordinary circumstances that are beyond an Agency s control and that prevent an Agency from carrying out within 15-days an on-site inspection for file review. Extraordinary circumstances include, but are not limited to, natural disasters and severe weather conditions. In the event of extraordinary circumstances that result in a reasonable-notice period longer than 15-days, an Agency must still select the relevant units and conduct the same-day on-site inspection or file review as soon as possible. 7. Use of the REAC Protocol: In order to use the inspection requirements relating to the REAC protocol, the inspection must satisfy the following requirements:             (i) Both vacant and occupied low-income units must be included in the population of units from which units are selected for inspection;             (ii) The inspection complies with the procedural and substantive requirements of the REAC protocol, including the requirements of the most recent REAC Uniform Physical Condition Standards (UPCS) inspection software, or software accepted by HUD;             (iii) The inspection is performed by HUD or HUD-Certified REAC inspectors; and             (iv) The inspection results are sent to HUD, the results are reviewed and scored within HUD s secure system without any involvement of the inspector who conducted the inspection, and HUD makes its inspection report available. 8. HUD Inspections that comply with the requirements of the REAC Protocol: the number of units required to be inspected under the REAC protocol satisfies the requirements of the final regulation concerning the number of low-income units the Agency must inspect. Also, the manner in which the low-income units are selected for inspection under the REAC protocol satisfies the requirements of the final regulation. 9. File Reviews for HUD Inspections that comply with the requirements of the REAC Protocol: An Agency that conducts physical inspections using the REAC protocol is not excused from following the requirements of the final regulations in selecting the files for review. 10. Circumstances under which the same files and units may be chosen for inspection: If an agency chooses to select the same units for on-site inspections and file reviews, the Agency must complete both the inspections and file reviews before the end of the day on which the units are selected.             It is important to note that the final regulation does not include a provision for desk audits of files. The regulation states that the Agency may review the low-income certifications wherever the owner maintains or stores the records (either on-site or off-site).             While HFAs may now inspect the lesser of the applicable number of units in the REAC chart or 20% of the low-income units in the project (rounded up to the next whole number), the rest of the 2019 regulation remains in place. If not done already, HFAs must amend QAPs to reflect these changes no later than December 31, 2020.

Affordable Housing Improvements May be Included in Next COVID-19 Legislation

While it is been delayed due to a Senate recess, there will be another COVID-19 relief package. Hopefully, it will be passed by Congress by mid-August and based on indications from Congressional staff, may include a number of affordable housing components. At this point, the most likely affordable housing improvements to be included in any COVID-19 relief include: Enactment of a four percent Housing Credit Rate - this rate is currently at an all-time low of 3.07 percent, which is threatening the viability of a number of pending deals. Enacting a minimum 4 percent rate is immediately needed and would provide parity to the nine percent housing credit rate, which was enacted as part of Congress s response to the 2008 economic crisis. Not only will a four percent rate provide an immediate equity infusion into developments now stalled, but it is estimated to produce 126,000 additional LIHTC apartments over the next ten years.Provide additional basis boosts to allow developments to access additional equity if needed for financial feasibility - boosts in eligible basis will supply needed equity for developments that are not currently financially feasible. The boost would apply to rural areas and Tax-Exempt Bond financed properties. Additional boosts may also be included for vulnerable populations, such as extremely low-income tenants and Native American communities.Allow developments to access four percent credits by lowering the "50% test" - Lowering the 50% threshold for bond financed deals will provide much needed flexibility for state agencies. In addition, a number of agencies have reached their bond cap, limiting the ability to access the four percent credits. Lowering the 50% test to 25% will allow the development of up to 1.4 million more LIHTC units in the next ten years.Increase the annual LIHTC allocation by at least 50 percent, phased in over two years, and adjusted for inflation, beginning in 2021 - This increase in credits will finance hundreds of thousands of affordable homes. While there is no guarantee that any of these changes will be included in the upcoming legislation, there is broad bi-partisan support for all of these, so - we re keeping our fingers crossed.

Rapid Action Needed for Owners Needing HUD COVID-19 Supplemental Payments

On July 23, 2020, HUD published Housing Notice H-2020-08, "Availability of Funds for COVID-19 Supplemental Payments (CSPs) for Properties Receiving Project-Based Rental Assistance Under the Section 8, Section 202, or Section 811 Programs." HUD is making available CARES Act funds to offset property expenditures to combat the effects of COVID-19. The notice provides a method for owners to receive payments beyond the amounts available under the terms of their current rental assistance contracts. The supplemental payments may cover the following costs: Increased frequency of cleaning and disinfecting common areas and property management offices as a preventative measure.Intensive deep cleaning and sanitization services in response to presence of COVID-19 cases at the property, which may include treatment in units being prepared for re-occupancy, in addition to common areas.Office technology and other equipment needs to facilitate social distancing.Personal protective equipment (PPE) such as face masks and goggles, gloves, hand hygiene products for use by property management staff and for residents entering leasing offices or using common areas.Facility and equipment needs related to maintaining adequate social distancing, including but not limited to cough/sneeze barriers or modifying or limiting access to communal spaces.Site control measures to enforce shelter-in-place orders, stay-at-home orders, or visitor-restriction policies within properties.Temporary staffing, contract services, and/or supply expenditures to maintain or enhance on-going service coordination in properties designated to serve the elderly or persons with disabilities (excludes grant-funded service coordinators).Temporary staffing increases to process higher-than-normal volumes of interim tenant recertifications requested by tenants due to loss of income. CSPs are not a means to receive funding for lower tenant rent payments due to income reductions, extended vacancies, or unpaid tenant charges. These financial impacts can be addressed through Special Claim Payment requests and through tenant recertifications with corresponding subsidy voucher adjustments. The notice allows owners to submit payment requests for expenses incurred between March 27, 2020 and July 31, 2020. Requests are due to HUD or the Contract Administrator by August 5, 2020. CSP funding is not being provided on a first-come, first-served basis. All requests received by HUD or the PBCA by 11:59 PM local time on August 5 will be given equal consideration. Requests received after this deadline may be evaluated at HUD s discretion only after all other eligible CSPs have been funded, and in no case will be considered if received after August 12, 2020. Property owners and management agents should contact their assigned HUD Account Executive or Contract Administrator with any questions about property eligibility for a CSP.

HUD Implements Housing Choice Voucher Mobility Demonstration Program

On July 15, 2020, HUD published in the Federal Register a Notice implementing the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Mobility Demonstration Program. This program was authorized by the 2019 and 2020 Appropriations Acts. Background The 2019 Appropriations Act, signed into law on February 15, 2019, made available $25 million to carry out an HCV mobility demonstration. The 2020 Appropriations Act, signed into law on December 20, 2019, made an additional $25 million available to the demonstration. Incremental voucher assistance for the HCV Mobility Demonstration Vouchers (MDVs) and mobility-related services made available under the notice may only be provided to families with children. The vouchers are designed to encourage such families to move to lower-poverty areas in order to expand their access to opportunity areas. The demonstration is effective until October 1, 2028. Program Design Recent research shows that growing up in neighborhoods with lower levels of poverty improves the academic achievement of children and their long-term chance of success. It also reduces intergenerational poverty. The HCV program offers families with vouchers the opportunity to live in a neighborhood of their choice, including low-poverty, opportunity neighborhoods. Despite this, families with HCVs often encounter barriers to using their vouchers in communities with expanded opportunities. Some barriers are financial, such not having enough money for a security deposit or maintaining a positive credit score. Other barriers may include inadequate time to find a unit, landlord unwillingness to participate in the program, or limited awareness of neighborhood amenities, such as the location of high-performing schools. Some PHAs and non-profits have implemented "housing mobility programs" to help reduce barriers for families with vouchers to live in neighborhoods of their choice. These programs often include "mobility-related services" such as pre- and post-move supports, family financial assistance (e.g., security deposits), landlord outreach, and housing search assistance. Building on recent research, and evidence from prior and existing housing mobility programs, the Seattle Housing Authority and King County Housing Authority partnered with researchers from Opportunity Insights, to implement and evaluate a housing mobility program they named "Creating Moves to Opportunity (CMTO)." Based on the initial report provided by the researchers, the provision of mobility-related services appear to have helped create strong gains in the number of families who moved to opportunity areas. Through the demonstration, HUD will implement, test, and evaluate whether housing mobility programs designed to increase family choice, actually expand access to opportunity neighborhoods. Overview This demonstration will allow participating PHAs throughout the country to implement housing mobility programs by offering mobility-related services to increase the number of voucher families with children living in opportunity areas. Again - only families with children may participate in the demonstration. To be eligible for the demonstration, PHAs must meet eligibility criteria, described in Section V of the notice. The demonstration includes four statutory categories of eligibility: Category A: PHA Partnerships;Category B: Consortia with High-Performing Family Self-Sufficiency (FSS) Program;Category C: Consortia with Small PHA; andCategory D: Single Agency HUD anticipates that most applications for the demonstration will come from multiple PHAs within a region submitting one application jointly. The demonstration is expected to be implemented by PHAs over the course of six years. Demonstration Size Using publicly available data on costs for mobility-related services, HUD estimates that there is enough available mobility-related service funding to provide services to at least 9,500 families. Preliminary calculations indicate that a minimal sample size of 1,950 families with children at each PHA site, across both treatment groups and the control group, is necessary to detect the impact of the treatments. To meet the minimum enrollment requirements, PHAs will primarily recruit and enroll existing voucher holders to participate in the demonstration. Award Description HUD expects to make approximately 5 - 10 awards for MDVs and mobility-related services together. HUD expects the minimum award amount, including both MDVs and mobility-related services funding, likely to be no less than $4 million and the maximum award likely to be no more than $10 million. HUD expects to announce the awards under this demonstration in December 2020, so interested PHAs need to move quickly. Only PHAs that already administer HCVs are eligible to apply. PHAs seeking additional information on this demonstration should contact Rebecca Primeaux, Director of the Housing Voucher Management & Operations Division at HUD. Her phone number is 202-708-1112 and her mailing address is Department of Housing & Urban Development, Seventh Street SW, Room 4214, Washington, DC 20410.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.