News

Occupancy Standards and Fair Housing

Every owner and manager of multifamily properties must develop occupancy standards for their property. It is these standards that determine how many people may live in a unit. When deciding on an occupancy standard, the key question is always - what is reasonable?   The industry standard has long been two people per bedroom. This standard originated from the HUD "Keating memo" in 1991. However, while indicating that the two-person per BR standard may be acceptable the memo made it clear that it was a "guide," and not a rule or a "safe-harbor". HUD indicated that factors in determining what is reasonable include:   Bedroom size; and Other factors - e.g., age of children.   Recent court cases have challenged the two-person per bedroom standard, especially in areas where state or local occupancy laws allow more people.   Occupancy standards are generally associated with familial status provisions of fair housing law. Courts have been quick to find that overly restrictive standards are a violation of fair housing law if they present artificial impediments to the ability of families with children to find housing.   While fair housing law permits the establishment of occupancy standards, these standards may not unreasonably limit the ability of families with children to find housing.   Owners should avoid a "one size fits all" policy. The characteristics of each property should be considered. Federal law defers to state and local law in the development of such policies. Nothing in federal law "limits the applicability of any reasonable local, state, or Federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling."   It is worth noting that the Keating Memo was not intended as public guidance - it was internal guidance for HUD enforcement staff. In 1998, Congress ordered HUD to adopt the Keating standard as HUD policy. However, as noted, this is not the only standard HUD will use in determining what is reasonable. For example, if bedrooms are large, more than two people per bedroom may be reasonable. Also, large apartments may have extra rooms such as dens, office, or loft that can be suitable as a bedroom. Other factors to be considered include the age of children, unit design, and utility capacity.   Basic Considerations When Setting Occupancy Standards Examine Current Standards: Don t automatically use the two person/bedroom standard. If local law will allow more than two people per bedroom, the more restrictive policy will be hard to defend. If a "rule-of-thumb" policy is used while researching local requirements, I recommend the "2+1" policy; i.e., two people per bedroom plus one (e.g., two-bedroom unit will permit five occupants). Check State & Local Codes: if there are state or local occupancy codes, they may be based on minimum square footage per person or minimum square footage per bedroom per person. A property will rarely be challenged for following state or local standards. In fact, HUD will review such standards when determining reasonability. Determining the applicability of state or local codes can be difficult. There may be fire codes, building codes, zoning codes, and property maintenance codes - all of which will have separate requirements. Consultation with a local attorney is always recommended when researching local requirements. Set Limits on the Number of People - Not the Number of Children: This was a primary element of the Keating Memo. Know the "Red Flags" that Fair Housing Agencies Will Look for: Making discriminatory statements; Adopting discriminatory rules relating to common areas; Taking steps to discourage the presence of children; Enforcing occupancy policies only against families with children; and Marketing a community as "adults only."   It is also unlawful to impose special requirements or conditions on families with children, such as limiting access to recreational services.   Be Careful When Considering the Age of Children When Setting Policies: While it may seem "reasonable" to deny a one-bedroom unit to an adult couple with a teenager, a couple with an infant should generally be allowed in a one-bedroom unit. Also, owners may not require male and female children, regardless of age, to have separate bedrooms. In addition, owners should not require adults and children of either gender to have separate bedrooms. Generally, it is best to follow the occupancy policy without regard to family characteristics. In other words, if your policy is to permit three people to live in a one-bedroom unit, you probably should permit any three people to live in the unit. Consider the Physical Limitations of Building Systems: The limits of a building s systems may provide a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for limiting the number of occupants. The capacity of septic, sewer, or other building systems can play a role in how an occupancy policy is determined. Document the Reasons for the Policy: This documentation should demonstrate a review of the following elements: Size of bedrooms & Unit: E.g., a family of five should be able to live in a unit with two large bedrooms and a large living room, but may not be suitable for a small two-bedroom mobile home; and Unit Configuration: E.g., two adults and three children apply for a two-bedroom unit. A unit with two bedrooms and a den would certainly be suitable for this family, but a two - bedroom with no other adequate sleeping room may not be.   Ultimately, the goal when establishing an occupancy policy should be to avoid over-crowding units, while not inhibiting the ability of families with children to find suitable housing. As long as an owner can demonstrate a sound reason for any occupancy restrictions, defending these policies - if challenged - is much more likely.  

Verifying the Income of Ride-Hailing Drivers

Verifying the Income of Ride-Hailing Drivers A recent study by the JP Morgan Chase Institute showed that from late 2013 to the Spring of 2018, there was a 2,000 percent increase in the number of Uber and Lyft drivers. This is one of the fastest growing segments of the employment industry and is known as "gig" employment. These drivers are considered self-employed and the average driver earns $20 per hour.   A growing number of people living in affordable housing developments (HUD, LIHTC, etc.) are engaged in ride-hailing businesses and managers of such properties are required to verify the income of these individuals - even though the income may be sporadic. While sporadic and non-recurring income is usually not counted for housing purposes, since these drivers are considered "self-employed," a reasonable determination of expected income is required.   Primary Verification Methods for Ride-Hailing Drivers There are a number of options available for verifying the income of ride-hailing drivers, including the following:   IRS Tax return, Form 1040, including Schedule C; Audited or unaudited financial statements (i.e., income/expense statement); Business loan application to a bank; or (as a last resort) A notarized affidavit regarding the net income from prior years.   In addition to these methods, all ride-hailing companies provide income statements showing monthly, quarterly, and annual earnings that are reported to the IRS. A Summary of Payments from the ride-hailing company is always available to the drivers and should always be requested. If using applicant provided financial statements, the amount of income counted should be the net income to the business. This is the gross receipts minus legitimate business expenses. For tax purposes, ride-hailing drivers must keep receipts of business expenses and should be able to provide a breakdown of those expenses. Deductible expenses include:   Passenger amenities (e.g., water, gum, etc.); Tolls; Parking; Maintenance; Gas; Vehicle loan interest; and Depreciation Note: only straight-line depreciation may be deducted for housing purposes. If a tax return or other document shows accelerated depreciation, managers may need to assistance of an accountant to determine the amount of straight-line depreciation.   Verifying the income of any person who recently started a business can be challenging, and this includes the income of ride-hailing drivers. In cases where tax returns have not yet been filed, a notarized statement from the driver with a statement of net income, along with income and expense records since the start of the business is recommended. From this information management may be able to determine a reasonable income projection, but there should still be follow up in a few months to ensure that the projection was reasonable.   As with all self-employed individuals, ride-hailing drivers are required to keep financial records. Using these records is generally the best and most acceptable method for determining the likely income of ride-hailing drivers.

Dealing with "Zero Income" Households

While "zero income" households are rare on Low-Income Housing Tax Credit properties (since there is no rental assistance, income is required in order to pay the rent), such households are not uncommon on Section 8 properties or developments with Rural Development rental assistance. There are a number of reasons why household members - or even entire households - may falsely claim zero income. Examples include   One member may claim no income in order to income qualify for the unit; or An entire Section 8 household may claim no income in order to pay no rent.   While residents may sign zero income affidavits, owners may not rely on such statements if a reasonable person would conclude that the household s income is higher that what is being represented.   When a statement of zero income is not credible, a detailed interview should be conducted. Elements of the interview should include:   Work History: ask about any jobs held in the past. Check credit reports for prior employers. If there is a work history - Why are they not now working? Are they seeking employment? If there is no work history, how have expenses been met in the past year?   Sources of Income: Ask about income from all sources, including Workman s Compensation; Unemployment; Inheritance; and Trust Funds Method of Paying for Living Expenses: how does the household pay for Groceries Clothing Rent Toiletries Utilities Laundry Phone Transportation Cleaning Supplies Money Accounts: Ask for documentation of bank accounts. If bank statements are obtained, look at deposits and withdrawals. Where did the money come from? Loan Information: if an applicant states that deposits are a loan (or repayment of a loan), ask to see loan documents. Who is making (or repaying) the loan? If the applicant claims to be the recipient of a loan, how will they repay it? Roommate History: ask about past roommates. If a roommate covered some of the expenses, will that roommate be moving in? If not, how will the expenses be paid?   Truly zero income households are virtually non-existent. This is because a household with absolutely no income would not be able to survive. However, it is possible to have a zero-income certification on a rent-assisted property. In these cases, management must ensure that a "survival statement" is obtained on which the applicant/tenant demonstrates how the costs associated with daily living will be met. And, for Section 8 and Rural Development properties with zero income certifications, a re-interview of the household every 90-days in order to ascertain potential income is strongly recommended.  

IRS 2018-2019 Priority Guidance Plan

On November 8, 2018, the IRS released a Priority Guidance Plan for the period July 1, 2018 - June 30, 2019.   This plan outlines the areas that the IRS intends to provide formal guidance on for the rest of 2018 and first half of 2019.   239 guidance projects are included, and the Plan will be updated as new items are added. At this point, five of the guidance items relate to affordable housing.     Regulations under Section 42 regarding the LIHTC average income test (this is guidance that the industry is especially eager to receive); Guidance regarding Opportunity Zones (OZs); Early OZ guidance has already been published: October 29, 2018 - Regulation 115420-18; and November 5, 2018 - IRB 2018-45 as Revenue Ruling 2018-29. Final regulation under Section 42 relating to compliance monitoring by the allocating agencies including issues identified in Notice 2012-18. Proposed and temporary regulations were issued on February 25, 2016. This regulation will relate to HFA property inspection requirements; Final Section 42 Utility Allowance regulation. Proposed and temporary regulations were published on March 3, 2016; and Guidance on tax-exempt private activity bonds under Section 142 of the Internal Revenue Code.   In addition to this anticipated guidance from the IRS, it is expected that Congressional action with regard to the LIHTC program will also occur in 2019 - should be a busy year.  

Environmental Issues Relating to Fair Housing

As we all know, the environment in which we live can impact our health and well-being. Bad water and bad air are known causes of health problems. What often goes unnoticed however is the environment within buildings - including homes.   One issue often overlooked by owners of older apartment communities is lead-based paint, which can have an especially harmful impact on young children. Lead-based paint is often found in homes that were built prior to 1978 (when lead-based paint in home construction was prohibited). Federal prosecutors have recently accused the New York City Housing Authority of failing to inspect for lead-based paint or to remove it or clean it up when it is found. There are other causes of indoor environmental problems, including pesticides, cleaning supplies, paint, mold, and even bed bugs.   Those most likely to be impacted by indoor environmental concerns are children, pregnant women, and the disabled. Owners cannot avoid liability by refusing to rent to high risk populations due to known hazards. For example, rejecting a pregnant woman or a family with children due to the presence of lead-based paint is a fair housing violation.   When persons with disabilities are impacted by environmental concerns, owners may have to change policies or procedures in order to accommodate the needs of the disabled individuals. Such accommodations could include changing paint, cleaning products, or pesticides. Removal of carpet and installation of air purifiers may be modifications that are required in order to alleviate environmental impact on the disabled.   Here are five recommendations that apartment owners should consider with regard to environmental concerns:   Don t exclude families with children to avoid lead-based paint exposure. Don t ignore environmental concerns. If a disabled person files a complaint regarding any environmental issue, it should be taken seriously. Owners may require medical verification regarding the need for any accommodation if the need is not obvious. The need for accommodations relative to environmental issues is generally not obvious. Evaluate requests relating to chemical sensitivity. A 1992 HUD memo recognized multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS) and environmental illnesses (EI) as fair housing disabilities. Consider all disability related requests for green alternatives to conventional products. There are environmentally friendly products relating to cleaning, painting, and pest control. Take secondhand smoke complaints seriously. Secondhand smoke is a known and legally established health hazard and complaints in this area must be dealt with immediately. This is one of the major reasons so many owners are now adopting no-smoking policies at their properties.   It is important that owners be aware that failure to act with regard to environmental concerns - whether indoors or out - can be a fair housing violation. Recognition of potential problems - and proactive action regarding those problems - can go a long way toward preventing complaints down the road.

LIHTC Lease - Important Elements

Important Elements of Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Leases   With the exception of having at least a six-month initial term when a household moves into a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) property, the IRS has no specific requirements regarding leases. In many ways, LIHTC leases mirror the leases for conventional apartment communities. However, the LIHTC program differs from conventional housing in many ways, so LIHTC leases should have certain clauses that reflect these differences. Following are some of the major elements that should be considered when preparing a LIHTC lease.   List every member of the household in the lease: while the lease should be signed by the head, co-head, and spouse, every person living in the unit should be listed on the lease. If a person will not be signing the lease, they should be listed as an "occupant." Unless a person age 18 or over is a full-time student, it is recommended that anyone age 18+ sign the lease. Keep in mind that everyone age 18 or older - including full-time students - should sign the Tenant Income Certification (TIC). Never show a live-in aide on a lease: Live-in aides should never appear on a lease - not even as an occupant. A recent court case in Arkansas found that since a live-in aide was not shown on the lease of a Section 8 property, the aide had no right to remain in the unit after the death of the resident. Listing the aide on the lease could make it more difficult to remove the aide in the case of the death or move-out of the resident for whom the aide was providing care. Specify which utilities the tenant will pay, and which will be paid by the landlord; Clearly separate optional charges from rent; g., pet fees should be shown as optional fees and not rent. Include a clause making it clear that residents must comply with the rules of the Section 42 program; Including a requirement to recertify and rules relating to student status, Require notification whenever there is a change in household composition Include a clause that allows the Owner (or representative) and staff of the State Housing Finance Agency (HFA) to inspect the units; At move in, make sure the initial lease term is at least six months: Failure to meet this six-month lease requirement could result in the State considering the unit to be "transient," meaning that it is not intended as a permanent residence. Single Room Occupancy (SRO) and Transitional Housing for the homeless may have a month-to-month lease at move-in. There are no IRS required leases: LIHTC leases should comply with state and local law and leases of other programs present at the property (e.g., HUD Section 8). Add lease clauses that increase efficiency and cash flow: Prohibit subletting, and specify that there may be no "AIRBNB;" and Include a "rent acceleration" clause, allowing for an increase in rent prior to the end of the lease term when income limits increase, or utility allowances decrease.   Finally, the lease should be reviewed by a local attorney for compliance with state and local laws, and it is a good idea to give the HFA an opportunity to review the lease. Clauses such as those outlined here will improve the operation of a LIHTC property.    

2019 Social Security COLA

The federal government announced on October 11, 2018 that the Social Security Cost of Live Adjustment (COLA) for 2019 will be 2.8%. This is the largest cost-of-living adjustment since 2012. The average SS check is $1,422 a month, meaning next year's increase will add an average of $39 per month.   Social Security recipients will receive a notice in the mail in early December showing their new benefit amount. Recipients will see the increase in their January 2019 payment.   Owners and managers of properties that are required to determine the income of residents should use the new COLA SS rate when projecting the income of applicants and residents. This also affects persons receiving SSI, VA pensions, Civil Service Pensions and Railroad Retirement.

Difference Between SSI and SSD

I recently received an email from a client who indicated that their corporate Section 8 department refused to accept a verification of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for a person under age 65 as a verification of disability. The Section 8 department believed that since it was not Social Security Disability (SSD), the person was not necessarily disabled. The Section 8 department was incorrect.   This article will provide a description of how SSI and SSD are alike - and how they are different.   How are the Two Programs Alike?   To qualify for disability benefits under either SSI or SSD, there is no difference between the two programs. The forms are the same, the application process is the same, and the rules for qualifying are the same. In this regard, they may as well be the same program.   How are the Two Programs Different?   The primary differences have to do with the amount of money individuals can receive and the medical benefits. SSI recipients may only receive whatever is the maximum SSI monthly benefit at any particular moment. For the year 2018, the monthly maximum SSI benefit amounts are $750 for an eligible individual and $1,125 for an eligible SSI recipient with an eligible spouse.   Social Security disability on the other hand is based on what a person paid into the system over their years of working. The average SSD benefit is currently approximately $1,200 but can exceed $2,000 per month.   Regarding medical benefits, SSI recipients receive Medicaid and SSD recipients receive Medicare benefits.   SSI is a disability program intended to help individuals who are not insured for Social Security disability. Individuals who have not worked, who have worked very little (possibly entitling them to a small SSD benefit amount that is under the SSI maximum benefit amount), who have worked in the past are no longer currently insured for SSD, and children. SSI disability is based on need - not insured status.   SSI disability beneficiaries must meet income and asset limits at the time of their disability application, when their disability claim is approved, and periodically as long as they are entitled to SSI disability benefits. SSI disability is a needs based disability program and like other needs based programs, SSI beneficiaries must meet the financial requirements of SSI to remain eligible to receive disability benefits. SSD beneficiaries are not subject to any resource and income limits.   In summary, while there are significant differences between SSI and SSD, eligibility is not one of them. If a person under age 65 is receiving SSI, they are disabled.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.