Court Rules Against Landlord and Will Not Dismiss LEP Case

person A.J. Johnson today 09/17/2022

A fair housing non-profit organization is suing two DeWitt, New York apartment complexes, alleging that they discriminate against foreign-born residents by refusing to rent to anyone who does not have someone who speaks English fluently living with them.

CNY Fair Housing filed the lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Syracuse, asking the Court to declare that Swiss Village Apartments and the Alps at Swiss Village are violating the federal Fair Housing Act with their policy of not renting to individuals or families with a limited ability to speak English.

The lawsuit was filed in November 2021, and also seeks an order barring the complexes from continuing their policy and asks the court to award the organization unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

CNY Fair Housing conducted a test of the properties after being alerted to the policy by a local housing services provider. In June 2019 and August 2020, two CNY staff posed as representatives of prospective tenants who speak only limited English. When the testers called the complexes, they were told by a leasing agent that tenants must be able to read and speak English so they could communicate with the site’s managers about any issues relating to their apartments.

When the testers said they would serve as translators for the applicants, they were told that someone living in the apartment had to be able to speak English.

The Landlord has asked that the court dismiss the case, arguing that (1) a prospective tenant’s language or Limited English Proficiency (LEP) status was not a protected class under federal or state fair housing law, and (2) the complaint failed to otherwise identify the prospective tenant’s race or national origin.

CNY Fair Housing has responded that consistent with HUD guidance and case law, a prospective tenant may adequately plead discrimination based on race or national origin using proof of a housing policy employing language-related criteria. The federal government submitted a statement of interest supporting the group's position.

The court has ruled against the Landlord and will not dismiss the case. The court gave deference to a 2016 HUD Guidance that concluded that LEP was often used as a pretext for national origin discrimination and that the FHA may be violated by "selective application of a language-related policy, or use of LEP as a pretext for unequal treatment of individuals based on race, national origin, or other protected characteristics." The court also found that nothing in the language of the FHA or related regulations prohibited the use of proof of LEP criteria as a pretext for race or national origin discrimination. Also, the group did not need to identify the specific national origin or race of particular tenants in order to state an initial case of discrimination under the FHA.

Unless the two parties settle the case, it now appears that the suit will be heard in federal court.

This case serves as a reminder that landlords should never have a policy requiring that applicants or residents speak English as a condition of occupancy.

Latest Articles

A. J. Johnson Partners with CHFA on Live Webinar - What Happens After an 8823 is Issued?

A.J. Johnson will be presenting 8823s - What Happens After They Are Sent to the IRS on October 20, 2022, at 11:00 AM (EST). This class will be offered through Colorado Housing and Finance Authority s chfareach educational programming for affordable housing property owners and managers. An updated link for course registration is included below. All tax credit professionals work hard to avoid the dreaded 8823 - Report of Noncompliance. However, properties still receive 8823s and those reports of noncompliance are sent to the IRS. But what happens then? What is the role of the HFA after it issues the 8823 to the IRS? What should a property owner do after being reported to the IRS for noncompliance? This 1.5-hour live webinar explores these issues and will outline the responsibilities of both the HFA and property owners after the issuance of an 8823. Unlike most LIHTC training, this session is presented from the point of view of the IRS and will provide owners and managers of LIHTC properties with a unique perspective regarding how to protect the credits for these important properties. The link to register for the session is

A. J. Johnson Partners with Enterprise to Provide LIHTC Training and HCCP Exam

On November 1, 2, and 3, A. J. Johnson will be partnering with Enterprise Community Partners for in-person training intended for real estate professionals, particularly those in the affordable multifamily housing field. Following the in-person training sessions, AJ will be providing a review of testable areas and in-person administration of the Housing Credit Certified Professional (HCCP ) exam. The following sessions will be presented: November 1, 2022: Intermediate LIHTC Compliance  - Designed for more experienced managers, supervisory personnel, investment asset managers, and compliance specialists, this program expands on the information covered in the Basics of Tax Credit Site Management. A more in-depth discussion of income verification issues is included as well as a discussion of minimum set-aside issues (including the Average Income Minimum Set-Aside), optional fees and use of common areas. The Available Unit Rule is covered in great detail, as are the requirements for units occupied by students. Attendees will also learn the requirements relating to setting rents at a tax credit property. This course contains some practice problems but is more discussion oriented than the Basic course. A calculator is required for this course. November 2, 2022: Advanced LIHTC Compliance - This full-day training is intended for senior management staff, developers, corporate finance officers, and others involved in decision-making with regard to how LIHTC deals are structured. This training covers complex issues such as eligible and qualified basis, applicable fraction, credit calculation (including first-year calculation), placed in service issues, rehab projects, tax-exempt bonds, projects with HOME funds, Next Available Unit Rule, employee units, mixed-income properties, the Average Income Minimum Set-Aside, vacant unit rule, and dealing effectively with State Agencies. Individuals who take both two days of training will be provided with study materials and a practice exam to assist in preparation for the HCCP exam, to be administered on November 3. November 3, 2022: Review of testable areas and administration of the Housing Credit Certified Professional (HCCP ) exam. Following the two days of intensive and comprehensive LIHTC training, AJ will provide a review of program requirements and will administer the HCCP exam in person. The training and exam will take place at the Doubletree by Hilton, 5485 Twin Knolls Road, Columbia, MD. Persons interested in any (or all) of these training sessions should contact Lisa Ciano at Enterprise Partners. Lisa s email is

Meta (formerly Facebook) Settles Fair Housing Complaint with DOJ

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving allegations that Meta Platforms, Inc., formerly known as Facebook, Inc., has engaged in discriminatory advertising in violation of the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The proposed agreement resolves a federal lawsuit alleging that Meta s housing advertising system discriminates against Facebook users based on their race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, and national origin. Meta uses algorithms in determining which Facebook users receive housing ads, and these algorithms rely, in part, on characteristics protected under the FHA. Under the settlement, which still must be approved by the federal court, Meta will stop using an advertising tool for housing ads (known as the "Special Ad Audience tool) that relies on a discriminatory algorithm. Meta will also develop a new system to address racial and other disparities caused by its use of personalization algorithms in its housing ad delivery system. The settlement marks the first time that Meta will be subject to court oversight for its ad targeting and delivery system. The DOJ lawsuit alleged both disparate treatment and disparate impact discrimination. Disparate treatment because it intentionally classifies users on the basis of FHA-protected characteristics and disparate impact because the algorithms affect Facebook users differently on the basis of their membership in protected classes.

HUD Finalizes New MOR Scheduling Protocol

Section 8 properties are subject to audits and inspections known as Management & Occupancy Reviews (MORs). HUD has recently introduced a new risk-based management and occupancy review schedule. The new schedule is designed to streamline and reduce the number of MOR reviews. The final rule implementing this new schedule comes seven years after the proposed rule and goes into effect on September 26. Based on HUD data, most sites have historically received "satisfactory, "above average, or "superior MOR scores. Therefore, there is no need to review properties as frequently as in the past. The new MOR schedule establishes a frequency for completion of MORs based on a site s previous MOR score and the site s rating or classification under a risk-based model. The frequency of MORs described here will begin with the first MOR scheduled on or after September 26. The final rule changes MOR scheduling for the following Section 8 Programs: New Construction;Substantial Rehabilitation;State Housing Agencies;New Construction financed under Section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949;Loan Management Set-Aside;HAP Program for the Disposition of HUD-Owned Projects; andSection 202/8 Program The schedule does not apply to restructured Mark-Market properties. Classifications The new MOR schedule establishes a frequency for the completion of MORs based on a site s previous MOR score and its risk classification. The risk classifications are: Not Troubled;Potentially Troubled; orTroubled The risk rating considers the site s financial characteristics such as low debt service coverage ratio, recent defaults, excessive vacancies, low REAC scores, tenant input provided directly to HUD, and pending foreclosure or partial claim payments. The New Schedule Section 8 sites that are "Potentially Troubled or "Troubled will automatically be reviewed annually. The new scheduling changes apply only to sites with a risk classification of "Not Troubled. If a site s risk classification is "Not Troubled and the MOR review conducted on September 26 or later is "Unsatisfactory or "Below Average, the next MOR will be conducted within 12 months.If a site s risk classification is "Not Troubled and the MOR review conducted on September 26 or later is "Satisfactory, the next MOR will be conducted within 24 months.If a site s risk classification is "Not Troubled and the MOR review conducted on September 26 or later is "Above Average or "Superior, the next MOR will be conducted within 36 months. Implementation Owners and managers will know the timeframe for the site s next review at the first MOR following September 26. In addition to the noted schedule change, the final rule states that a MOR must be conducted within six months of a management or ownership change regardless of the results of the previous MOR. It should be noted that MORs are not the same as REAC physical inspections, which are not affected by the new rule.

Want news delivered to your inbox?

Subscribe to our news articles to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.